On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:49 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 08:16 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
> > marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
> > regular folders.
> >
> > You can View->S
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 08:16 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
> marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
> regular folders.
>
> You can View->Show Deleted Messages, but the Junk messages are shown
> in the Ju
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2015, 08:16 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
> On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 14:08 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> Hi,
> the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
> marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
> re
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2015, 07:51 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear Evolution folks,
>
>
> is running Evolution 3.16 with GNOME 3.14 supported, that means tested
> by someone? Will all futures work?
>
> I am thinking about if it’s feasible to put Evolution 3.16 in Debian
> Backports [1] for Deb
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:55 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 02.05.2015, 11:58 + schrieb Joakim Tjernlund:
> > You need to set LDFLAGS too
>
> Unfortunately it still fails to build when passing
> `LDFLAGS='-fsanitize=address'`.
what is your complete build command and the error outp
On 2015-05-05 at 08:12, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:50 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>> As the local backend can cope with missing UIDs, I guess the
>> read-only On The Web backend can safely add missing UIDs as well.
>
> Hi,
> I did so, for 3.17.2+ [1] and 3.16.2+ [2]. It requ
