On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:04 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote:
> > Paul: I'm not sure how much influence you have, but I'm (a) very much
> > interested in seeing this fix applied to 14.04, and (b) using 14.04
> > specifically because it's an LTS version
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:18 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I would have thought there is a case for saying that the tree
> shouldn't be re-ordered whilst you remain in the folder.
>
> I must admit that I find the re-ordering annoying in other circumstances
> - when a new email is received, the thread
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:04 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:52 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > The most recent version of this thread from a couple of weeks ago
> > > starts
> > > here:
> > >
> > > https://mail.gnome.org
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:04 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Paul: I'm not sure how much influence you have, but I'm (a) very much
> interested in seeing this fix applied to 14.04, and (b) using 14.04
> specifically because it's an LTS version and not just to be a jerk: I
> use Ubuntu for my work machin
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:52 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > The most recent version of this thread from a couple of weeks ago
> > starts
> > here:
> >
> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2015-March/msg00032.html
>
> Just a note, I
>
> It would be weird to treat your mail in "blocks" of retrieved messages,
> and only sort them within those blocks so that messages in
> newly-retrieved blocks aren't added to previously retrieved blocks,
> unless you exit/re-enter the folder to get a total reorder. Maybe I
> don't understand
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:04 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Would it help if you turned on "show deleted messages" (or off "hide
> > deleted messages") - then it wouldn't ever need to re-order the
> list?
>
> Possibly... but I don't like to show my deleted messages :)
IMHO the ordering should take i
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:18 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > In the above situation, I use C-d to delete the current message. I
> > thought the problem was that the cursor then skipped the next message
> > but what happens is more subtle than that: the cursor does correctly go
> > to the next message
> Aha! Interesting! I just got it to happen again and noticed something
> important. I had a thread like this:
>
> --> Joe v help with thisToday 00:57
> Bob help with this Today 02:43
> Joev help with this Today 01:14
> Bob
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I'll follow up if/when I get any fresh detail.
Aha! Interesting! I just got it to happen again and noticed something
important. I had a thread like this:
--> Joe v help with thisToday 00:57
Bob help with this
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> The most recent version of this thread from a couple of weeks ago
> starts
> here:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2015-March/msg00032.html
Just a note, Iain submitted a patch this week for this for the next
Ubuntu 15.04 re
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:52 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> it uses the tree, basically what you see in UI, positioning based on
> the selected row index. There is some influence of collapsed threads,
> usually above the selected message. I recall a bug with a race
> condition on the positioning, two
> This is installed in Ubuntu 14.04. It's version 3.10.4.
>
> Bogofilter is installed on the system, but it does not show up in
> edit->preferences->junk.
>
> I'm assuming that I'm missing the bogofilter plugin even though the
> Synaptic page on Evolution claims that it's included.
>
> So, um
13 matches
Mail list logo
