On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:19 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Next daft newbie-user question... how do I make that the default for
> *all* folders instead of having to change them one by one?
Hi,
the more general approach is not that obvious, which is a pita.
Instead of saving your view as
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 13:20 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> It would be interesting to know what the
> "next-message" code uses for ordering.
>
Hi,
it uses the tree, basically what you see in UI, positioning based on
the selected row index. There is some influence of collapsed threads,
usual
Spamassassin seems to not work at all for me, as of about a month ago.
All it does is consume lots of CPU time when I mark mail as junk, but
it's not finding spam on its own.
I'd prefer Bogofilter (it just seemed to work better in Ubuntu 12), but
I've never been able to get it to work with Evoluti
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I don't know about that, but you can save a custom view (including sort
> order) by setting the folder how you want and then doing View -> Current
> View -> Save view. Then it's reasonably trivial to set the correct
> view of a folder when yo
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > Next daft newbie-user question... how do I make that the default
> > for
> > *all* folders instead of having to change them one by one?
>
> I don't know about that, but you can save a custom view (including
> sort order) by setting t
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Next daft newbie-user question... how do I make that the default
> for
> > *all* folders instead of having to change them one by one?
>
> I don't know about that, but you can save a custom view (including
> sort
> order) by setting the fold
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 13:20 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I don't have a custom sort order, and I also see the saner
> behaviour
> > you describe, Patrick. If I delete a message, focus moves to the
> next
> > message below it in the display. Not the next newer message in the
> > mailbix which may
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:11 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:08 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My main issue with the sorting, FWIW, is the fact that we sort
> > > > on the Date: header and not the time th
>
> Next daft newbie-user question... how do I make that the default for
> *all* folders instead of having to change them one by one?
I don't know about that, but you can save a custom view (including sort
order) by setting the folder how you want and then doing View -> Current
View -> Save vie
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:56 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I don't have a custom sort order, and I also see the saner behaviour
> you describe, Patrick. If I delete a message, focus moves to the next
> message below it in the display. Not the next newer message in the
> mailbix which may be els
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:08 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > >
> > > My main issue with the sorting, FWIW, is the fact that we sort
> > > on the Date: header and not the time the message was actually
> > > *delivered*. So when we get a misdate
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:08 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > >
> > > My main issue with the sorting, FWIW, is the fact that we sort
> > > on the Date: header and not the time the message was actually
> > > *delivered*. So when we get a misdate
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > My main issue with the sorting, FWIW, is the fact that we sort on the
> > Date: header and not the time the message was actually *delivered*. So
> > when we get a misdated mail from the future, it sits as the "newest"
> > message in t
>
> My main issue with the sorting, FWIW, is the fact that we sort on the
> Date: header and not the time the message was actually *delivered*. So
> when we get a misdated mail from the future, it sits as the "newest"
> message in the mailbox until the world finally catches up with it. Or
> w
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:44 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 08:21 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > I have folders ordered by Received (Descending, i.e. the oldest
> > thread
> > > first) and this problem doesn't happen to me. I suspect the
> > > problem has to do with wanti
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 08:21 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I have folders ordered by Received (Descending, i.e. the oldest
> thread
> > first) and this problem doesn't happen to me. I suspect the problem
> > has to do with wanting the most recent thread (i.e. the thread with
> > the most recent messa
It seems to happen on many applications that rely on GTK. Thunderbird
does it from the tab bar, firefox doesn't do it anymore. It's especially
annoying in Eclipse (I have an expanded window, go and click on a
toolbar button, if I miss and click the blank part of the menu bar, it
picks the window up
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 11:31 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It's never been completely clear to me what these ordering really mean
> when combined with threading.
I'm not so worried about the order in which different threads are
displayed. But within a single thread it seems to me that whatev
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 15:00 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all. This has bugged me for years but never enough to complain about
> it (until now, I guess :)). I wonder if it's just me, or just my setup,
> or what. I'm currently using Evolution 3.12.10 but I've seen this for a
> number of releases
19 matches
Mail list logo
