Hi all. This has bugged me for years but never enough to complain about
it (until now, I guess :)). I wonder if it's just me, or just my setup,
or what. I'm currently using Evolution 3.12.10 but I've seen this for a
number of releases (maybe always?)
I order my folders by Received (Ascending) s
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 17:54 +, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> Thank you andre. Is there a syntax list for the old "expression"
> condition? I am currently unable to utilize the new revision.
https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/unstable/mail-filters-conditions.html
states "Match a message accordin
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 18:17 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Once 3.16 is released, the user documentation update in unstable
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=0b2ddf608d1ecca0f6995ff950cbfdbfe0601bb7
> will be available on https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/
>
> The ava
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 15:10 +, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> Nice! I have been unable to find any documentation defining the syntax
> for the "Expression" condition. Would you be able to point me in the
> right direction where this syntax is defined.
Once 3.16 is released, the user documentation up
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 06:56 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Your version supports expressions too, but of a different syntax (not
> much different, but still). Make your filter rule look like:
>
>All conditions are met
>[ Sender ] [contains] [email]
>[ Expression ] [ or((header-contains "S
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 09:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> If your filter set up is fairly simple you could possibly put the set
> of
> filters at the end of the processing, then the first would be
>
> Sender: does not contain: email address
> Stop Processing
>
> Then the next filter would be
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 14:00 +1100, David Griffiths wrote:
> Has any one experienced this problem. Opened up evolution to check mail
> and basically watched the emails already there vanish before my eyes.
> Currently run Trisquel.
See https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/mail-cannot-s
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:33:26 +0100, Andre Klappe wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 08:16 +, D'Eimar De Jabrun Guillaume wrote:
Is there any way to keep the same (or almost) HTML format when
replying ?
Setting reply format to HTML doesn't help as the original message format
is still lost.
P
Hi,
Has any one experienced this problem. Opened up evolution to check mail
and basically watched the emails already there vanish before my eyes.
Currently run Trisquel.
hope someone can help.
David
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 21:19 +, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an "OR" statement within
> a condition? One of my filter rules is dependent on the "sender" with a
> variable of different subject lines. Adding an additional condition with
> rule match to "a
10 matches
Mail list logo
