Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 21:34 -0500, Adam Seering wrote: > I seem to have touched off a bit of a discussion here... > > It sounds like Evolution's indexing support is very protocol- > specific. I guess my specific question should be: Does Evolution > EWS support full-text indexing? > > If not: I

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Adam Seering
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 01:50 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:39:20 +0100 > Ángel González wrote: > > > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > > > > I doubt there is a MUA that is going to nicely handle full-text > > > search of very large mailboxes. You really need an index to hand

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:39:20 +0100 Ángel González wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > > I doubt there is a MUA that is going to nicely handle full-text > > search of very large mailboxes. You really need an index to handle > > that type of search - and I am not aware of any MUA which inde

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Ángel González
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > I doubt there is a MUA that is going to nicely handle full-text search > of very large mailboxes. You really need an index to handle that type > of search - and I am not aware of any MUA which indexes message > *content* [vs. headers and meta-data]. What about evo

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 16:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:32:20 +0100 > Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 18:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > Searches with Evolution on my machine take hours > > That highly depends on account types (remote vs local) that you

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:32:20 +0100 Andre Klapper wrote: > On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 18:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Searches with Evolution on my machine take hours > > That highly depends on account types (remote vs local) that you didn't > mention. Local POP accounts. And it's also OT, becau

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 18:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Searches with Evolution on my machine take hours That highly depends on account types (remote vs local) that you didn't mention. > At the moment I can't say what MUA does fit best to my needs Sure, but that's pretty offtopic for this threa

Re: [Evolution] [solved] Evolution 3.12.7 segmentation fault

2014-11-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 05:38:07 -0800 (PST) rosemont wrote: > Just ran into the same symptom, and had it work after downgrading > sqlite. I reported it to my distro's bug tracker and IIRC it's already fixed by upstream, so the next release of Evolution likely doesn't suffer from this issue.

Re: [Evolution] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

2014-11-03 Thread Adam Seering
On 02.11.2014 13:06, Pete Biggs wrote: On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 12:04 -0500, Adam Seering wrote: Hi all, When I try to search for a string in the full text of a message, the search takes a very long time. I haven't investigated closely, but based on how much disk activity I'm seeing, it looks

Re: [Evolution] [solved] Evolution 3.12.7 segmentation fault

2014-11-03 Thread rosemont
Just ran into the same symptom, and had it work after downgrading sqlite. Obviously evolution-data-server 3.12.7.1 does not fix this. One thing that I noticed was for the contacts, I could add or edit, but could not delete an existing contact (foreign key constraint error). I could delete new co