Hi,
Recently evolution shows the following message when accessing my IMAP
account or expunging the folder:
Failed to refresh folder "INBOX".
The reported error was "Error syncing changes: Command Argument Error.
11
What to do? The problem is stuck on this particular box, and is not
present on oth
Am Freitag, den 13.06.2014, 09:09 +1000 schrieb Parth Shukla:
> Hi all,
>
> I sent an email yesterday but it hasn't made it into the mail archives
> so I'm wondering if it was dropped due to attachments?
>
> Original message below with attachments removed.
You could file a bug report at https://
Hi all,
I sent an email yesterday but it hasn't made it into the mail archives
so I'm wondering if it was dropped due to attachments?
Original message below with attachments removed.
Can someone confirm my email(s) are getting through to the mailing list
or not or if there is something I'm missi
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 19:44 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> Sure, running your own mail server gives you the ability to implement
> all manner of heuristics and grey listing and scoring so you can get
> close to the nirvana of a 100% spam classification - but you will never
> get 100% and, more importa
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I'm pleased to have a couple of replies to my posting, but still no
> answers to the question: how to recognize junk on the existence of a
> particular header without concern for its content.
Define a filter (On Specific Header) with the
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 13:27 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 01:22 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:57 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> >> Is there a plan to backport this to current Fedora?
> > 3.12 is already available for the current Fedora:
> >
> > https://copr.fed
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 19:21 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:04 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> >> The right place is the mail server, which should recognize that
> >> the mail is junk AND REJECT IT. ...
> >
> >
Hello again,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Not only that, Yahoo manages the server operated by my ISP, which is
ATT, so I am stuck with them.
No, you aren't stuck with them. AFAICT our ISP (BT, formerly British
Telecom, at the moment) also uses Yahoo servers. But we don't. B
Hi there,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:04 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
The right place is the mail server, which should recognize that
the mail is junk AND REJECT IT. ...
This is far too simplistic. Not all mail identified as spam is in fact
spam, an
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 13:27 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> This is not an official Fedora 20 repository.
> A complete application freeze is a serious problem and IMHO should be
> addressed officially.
It's as official as you're gonna get until Fedora 21.
__
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:57 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> Is there a plan to backport this to current Fedora?
>
I think that's something you need to ask on the Fedora lists not here.
P.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702703
Almost a year later, are there any plans to address the problem?
I am tired of applying my dirty patch every time a new
evolution-data-server package comes out.
Eugene.
___
evolution-list mailing list
On 06/12/2014 01:22 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:57 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
Is there a plan to backport this to current Fedora?
3.12 is already available for the current Fedora:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/
This is not an official Fedo
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:57 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> Is there a plan to backport this to current Fedora?
3.12 is already available for the current Fedora:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/
___
evolution-list mailing lis
Is there a plan to backport this to current Fedora?
On 06/12/2014 10:48 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:27 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
Any ideas how to debug this anomaly?
evolution-3.10.4-2.fc20.x86_64
Might be https://bugzilla.gnome.org/724909, fixed in 3.12.
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:04 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> > The right place is the mail server, which should recognize that
> > the mail is junk AND REJECT IT. Putting it in some 'spam' store
> > on your computer is no good at all, bec
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:04 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> The right place is the mail server, which should recognize that
> the mail is junk AND REJECT IT. Putting it in some 'spam' store
> on your computer is no good at all, because the message has been
> accepted by the mail server and the spamme
Hi there,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Yahoo, my ISP, marks messages that it thinks are junk ...
H. In my book, even using a Yahoo server means the mail
is probably junk, so I reject the lot.
I would like evolution to recognize such messages as junk.
The mail client i
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:27 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> Any ideas how to debug this anomaly?
>
> evolution-3.10.4-2.fc20.x86_64
Might be https://bugzilla.gnome.org/724909, fixed in 3.12.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To ch
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:27 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> Recently I noticed that I am unable to open messages with attached xml
> files. UI completely freezes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724909 ?
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
Recently I noticed that I am unable to open messages with attached xml
files. UI completely freezes.
"Retrieving message" is displayed in status bar. Process "evolution"
does not respond to SIGINT.
Strace shows some threads are active, but not much activity overall,
mostly poll().
Watching for s
21 matches
Mail list logo
