On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 10:27 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > A better way of getting the radiographic data or any other large
> file
> > is for you to upload it to a Cloud or to a sharing service and then
> > include a link to that in your email.
>
> Yeah, that's convenient. For me, just em
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 14:19 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
> A better way of getting the radiographic data or any other large file
> is for you to upload it to a Cloud or to a sharing service and then
> include a link to that in your email.
Yeah, that's convenient. For me, just email it.
> Means the
Hi :)
A better way of getting the radiographic data or any other large file is for
you to upload it to a Cloud or to a sharing service and then include a link to
that in your email. Means the email itself is much lighter-weight and so it
travels faster, less likely to get corrupted en-route, l
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 11:49 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
> But for sure I am able to send from my private account (1&1) messages
> up
> to 60-70 MB - so far I tested. I don't want to flood the internet -
> but
> from time to time, we have to send large amounts of radiograph data
> and
> need a quick
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 11:49 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
> This limit message came from my old alma mater account where they seem
> to be aware of these problems.
> But for sure I am able to send from my private account (1&1) messages up
> to 60-70 MB - so far I tested. I don't want to flood the inte
> Even in 'managed' code [Java, .NET, etc...] it involves sifting through
> a lot of data; first you have to see the leak, and *then* you have to
> figure out what code is to blame. And asking yourself 'why didn't I
> just become a bar tender?'
Because after a few nights of dealing with drunk pu
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 11:57 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.03.2013, 00:54 +0100 schrieb Thomas Prost:
> > Am Montag, den 11.03.2013, 16:55 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
> > (...)
> > > Widgets from closed composer windows were sticking around in memory and
> > Is there an easy
Am Mittwoch, den 27.03.2013, 00:54 +0100 schrieb Thomas Prost:
> Am Montag, den 11.03.2013, 16:55 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
> (...)
> >
> > Widgets from closed composer windows were sticking around in memory and
> Is there an easy way to check that ^^ ?
obvi
Am Freitag, den 05.04.2013, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs:
> > > > ??? What the hell is this -->
> > > >
> > > > Fehler bei »Nachricht wird verschickt«.
> > > >
> > > > DATA-Befehl gescheitert: a message size of 40962 kilobytes exceeds the
> > > > size limit of 40960 kilobytes computed for this
> > > ??? What the hell is this -->
> > >
> > > Fehler bei »Nachricht wird verschickt«.
> > >
> > > DATA-Befehl gescheitert: a message size of 40962 kilobytes exceeds the
> > > size limit of 40960 kilobytes computed for this transaction
> > >
> > > just returned from evolution2.32.2-0ubuntu :-(
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:47 +, frederic wrote:
> I was used to backup my e-mail every 6 months in an
> mbox file (as was the native storage for previous versions of evolution) and
> storing this on a file server. I was sort of a convenient 1 file for 1
> period and 1 mailbox format. Now his has
Am Freitag, den 05.04.2013, 09:35 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs:
> On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 08:50 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
> > ??? What the hell is this -->
> >
> > Fehler bei »Nachricht wird verschickt«.
> >
> > DATA-Befehl gescheitert: a message size of 40962 kilobytes exceeds the
> > size limit of
Pete Biggs biggs.org.uk> writes:
...
> Revert to mbox? You can sort of do it, but why? (You need to create a
> new account within Evolution of type mbox and then copy all your mail
> there, but new mail will still be put in the local Maildir files when it
> arrives - there's no way to change th
@Adam: I think you misread what I wrote. I said that I had made a backup
of my mail. I was only concerned about other users who might be less
careful than me.
Thanks to Thomas, I was able to figure out that I was wrong and
evolution has moved my mail from ~/.evolution/mail/local to
~/.local/evolut
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 08:50 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
> ??? What the hell is this -->
>
> Fehler bei »Nachricht wird verschickt«.
>
> DATA-Befehl gescheitert: a message size of 40962 kilobytes exceeds the
> size limit of 40960 kilobytes computed for this transaction
>
> just returned from evolu
15 matches
Mail list logo