[Evolution] Security implications of WebKit migration

2012-08-21 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Evolution folks, finding two bug reports in the Debian BTS about not-existing security support for WebKit releases, I am wondering if the WebKit migration of Evolution will also suffer from that. It comes to my mind, that one of Microsoft Outlook’s biggest security issues is (was(?)) due to

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 11:45 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > I also wonder why it worked with Evolution 3.2 and does not with 3.4. > > So it looks like a new bug to me. GTK+ 3.4 is rife with regressions due mostly to the move to X Input Extension 2.x (XI2) and CSS handling changes. If you build Evolu

Re: [Evolution] Again no smooth upgrade from Evolution 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:50 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > 1. The settings for sorting of messages were not kept. I had it on > »Date« before and after starting Evolution 3.4 nothing was selected, > which was quite confusing since messages are not displayed where they > are supposed too. The fact

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2012, 11:17 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 10:51 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > This is > > > > libgtk-3-0 3.4.2-3 > > > > from Debian Sid/unstable [1]. > > The bug is fixed in 3.4.4. I know. I cannot deduce from your short answer, what you mean exac

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 10:51 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > This is > > libgtk-3-0 3.4.2-3 > > from Debian Sid/unstable [1]. The bug is fixed in 3.4.4. andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ evolution-list mailing

Re: [Evolution] Again no smooth upgrade from Evolution 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi, On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:50 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > unfortunately after upgrading from Evolution 3.2 to 3.4 there were again > changes and regressions. Is there no way to do some quality assurance? Oh, sure there is: Get a Service Level Agreement with the business edition of your favorite

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2012, 10:30 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:41 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > using Debian Sid/unstable, today I finally upgraded from Evolution > > 3.2.2-1 to 3.4.3-1 after having delayed that for several weeks. > > > > The GtkStyle transparency issue

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:41 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > using Debian Sid/unstable, today I finally upgraded from Evolution > 3.2.2-1 to 3.4.3-1 after having delayed that for several weeks. > > The GtkStyle transparency issue when using a non-GNOME window manager > [1] has been fixed in GTK 3 alrea

[Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Evolution folks, using Debian Sid/unstable, today I finally upgraded from Evolution 3.2.2-1 to 3.4.3-1 after having delayed that for several weeks. The GtkStyle transparency issue when using a non-GNOME window manager [1] [Bug 671437] GtkStyle background color regression has been fixe

[Evolution] Again no smooth upgrade from Evolution 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-21 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Evolution folks, unfortunately after upgrading from Evolution 3.2 to 3.4 there were again changes and regressions. Is there no way to do some quality assurance? It is disappointing that there are issues after *every* upgrade. It is really a bad user experience and quite nerve taking. Here a