On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 09:57 -0700, t...@wescottdesign.com wrote:
> Evolution doesn't actually delete messages until you do some special
> action (I can't remember what it is -- look through the menus and
> it'll be obvious).
Ctrl-E or Folder->Expunge. Also File->Empty Trash (no keyboard shortcut
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:41 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 08:19 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > I'm still a little confused as to why so many users seem to feel the
> > need to backup and restore their personal data just to upgrade their
> > operating system in place. Backing up
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 21:31 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> That's not acceptable. If you delete the account from Evolution, it
> should *stay* deleted. Perhaps it should automatically turn off the
> corresponding Online Accounts setting for email.
>
> Please could you file a bug?
No need, it's a
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:23 -0300, Lailah wrote:
> I've found the root of the problem: In Online Accounts, was
> "on" for Mail, Contacts, Docs, Chat and Calendar. I've put an "off" on
> Calendar and Mail, and IMAP account vanished. Was magic!
That's not acceptable. If you delete the acc
On 2012-07-01 07:54, MR ZenWiz wrote:
I did File->Import and selected my old Inbox to import. As I said,
it imported fine, but everything was marked unread and there were
almost twice as many messages as I remembered being in my inbox -
over
3000. (I know, too many, but still only 1899 shoul
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 08:19 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> I'm still a little confused as to why so many users seem to feel the
> need to backup and restore their personal data just to upgrade their
> operating system in place. Backing up of course is a prudent safety
> measure, but if the upgrade
> >
> > If Evolution finds old style config and data files then it will attempt
> > to convert them into the new formats and use them. This process can be
> > seen if you start Evolution from the command line. If those files are
> > in the wrong place or unreadable or corrupt, then obviously Evo
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
>
> That strikes me as odd, Ubuntu being a Debian based distro.
>
Me, too.
> I'd love to know what's so problematic about Ubuntu upgrades.
>
I'm not entirely sure, but typically it has to do with how many levels
of release one is upgrading. T
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 07:46 -0700, Mark wrote:
> With Ubuntu, upgrades are frequently problematic and re-installs work
> better. This is as documented by the Ubuntu folks.
That strikes me as odd, Ubuntu being a Debian based distro.
I've been typing "apt-get dist-upgrade" on my stable Debian mach
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 12:00 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>> It seems to me that all the people who have had problems with the
>> upgrade process recently have been Ubuntu users and I wonder if there is
>> something they've done in the packaging o
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 19:14 -0700, MR ZenWiz wrote:
>> I recently installed Xubuntu 12.04 on my home desktop, and the new
>> evolution does not recognize the old configuration of my on-board
>> email files.
>
> If Evolution finds old style config
[Damn reply not to all...]
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 12:00 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>> It seems to me that all the people who have had problems with the
>> upgrade process recently have been Ubuntu users and I wonder if there is
>> something the
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 16:11 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> The second filter would be executed on the original message, not on the
> new copy of the original message in the "processed" folder - that's
> probably the part here.
I would clarify that first part:
"The second filter would be executed o
On 2012-06-30, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 20:54 +, Paul Murphy's unattended box wrote:
>> My first filter pipes all incoming messages to an external program,
>> and then moves the message to a "processed" folder.
>> The second filter then moves the message somewhere else (e.g
On 2012-06-29, Jeffrey Needle wrote:
>
> When I compose mail, or read most mails, the background to the
> message body is gray while the text is black. Earlier versions of
> Evolution gave a bright white background, much easier for my old
> eyes.
>
> Is there a way to adjust this, so I get the wh
>
> Are there actually distro installers that don't allow you to upgrade
> without nuking your home directory, or do some installers not make that
> option clear enough, or am I just misunderstanding the problem?
Well, probably not an issue here, and probably not a mainstream user
distro, but th
Matthew Barnes wrote:
>I'm still a little confused as to why so many users seem to feel the
>need to backup and restore their personal data just to upgrade their
>operating system in place. Backing up of course is a prudent safety
>measure, but if the upgrade goes smoothly there should be no ne
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 12:00 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> It seems to me that all the people who have had problems with the
> upgrade process recently have been Ubuntu users and I wonder if there is
> something they've done in the packaging or configuration that is causing
> problems.
I'm still a lit
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 19:14 -0700, MR ZenWiz wrote:
> I recently installed Xubuntu 12.04 on my home desktop, and the new
> evolution does not recognize the old configuration of my on-board
> email files.
If Evolution finds old style config and data files then it will attempt
to convert them into
19 matches
Mail list logo
