Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0.3 on Koji -- Still Broken

2011-08-31 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:36 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > (1) Evolution-help-3.0.3 is missing from the release set. > > Not true. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2680709 > > You may be getting tripped up becaus

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0.3 on Koji -- Still Broken

2011-08-31 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > (1) Evolution-help-3.0.3 is missing from the release set. Not true. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2680709 You may be getting tripped up because evolution-help is a noarch package, whereas the other are all x86_64 pac

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0.3 on Koji -- Still Broken

2011-08-31 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 22:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > (2) Font handling still does not work properly, at least under KDE. > > No font control using, either KDE font control or local evolution font > > control, i.e. > > Evol

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0.3 on Koji -- Still Broken

2011-08-31 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > (2) Font handling still does not work properly, at least under KDE. > No font control using, either KDE font control or local evolution font > control, i.e. > Evolution->Edit-Preferences->Mail Preferences->Message Display > The fo

[Evolution] Evolution 3.0.3 on Koji -- Still Broken

2011-08-31 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
I have just installed evolution 3.0.3 from Fedora's Koji system with the hope that it would handle fonts, at least, better. No such luck. Problems: (1) Evolution-help-3.0.3 is missing from the release set. # rpm --upgrade *.rpm error: Failed dependencies: evolut

Re: [Evolution] Is it possible to order sidebar entries as desired?

2011-08-31 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:33 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote: > I have two categories in my sidebar: On This Computer and One for my > mail servers. Each of the subcategories are ordered alphabetically. > Is it possible to order them differently? How do I go about it? I > tried dragging and dropping

[Evolution] Is it possible to order sidebar entries as desired?

2011-08-31 Thread Leonard Evens
I have two categories in my sidebar: On This Computer and One for my mail servers. Each of the subcategories are ordered alphabetically. Is it possible to order them differently? How do I go about it? I tried dragging and dropping, but it didn't work. -- Leonard Evens l...@math.northwestern.

Re: [Evolution] 3.0.3 is out: Re: Bug#638936: Stability of evo?

2011-08-31 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mer., 2011-08-31 at 14:08 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > evo 3.03 is now out. http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/download.shtml > Please package this bug-fixed version. The constant reloading of POP3 > mails should be fixed. Hopefully the frequent crashes I see on one of my > computers are gone

Re: [Evolution] [RFC]: Quicker stable releases to fix serious bugs.

2011-08-31 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:31 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I think the only realistic solution there is to keep the various stable > NEWS files (mainly [1] and [2]) up-to-date as bug fixes are backported, > rather than updating the file immediately before release. A wiki page > would just be dupli

Re: [Evolution] [RFC - general discussion] GNOME standard email program should have "Remove Duplicates" feature by default...

2011-08-31 Thread N B Day
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 16:34 -0400, Barry Smith wrote: > Based upon my searches in the last few minutes, I must update Ubuntu > Natty to Gnome 3 before I can update evo to 3.0.2. > > Is that correct? > Ubuntu Oneric (beta 1 tomorrow, official release date 13 October) shows "evolution 3.1.5-0 ubun

Re: [Evolution] [RFC]: Quicker stable releases to fix serious bugs.

2011-08-31 Thread Matthew Barnes
The evolution-hackers list is a better forum for this topic, so cross-posting. On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:45 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Therefore could you please roll releases more often? At least were > serious issues are fixed, could you release 3.0.2.x so that > distributions can pick those u

[Evolution] 3.0.3 is out: Re: Bug#638936: Stability of evo?

2011-08-31 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 18:10 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer., 2011-08-24 at 16:47 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:34 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > After having a lot of problems

Re: [Evolution] [RFC]: Quicker stable releases to fix serious bugs.

2011-08-31 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:45 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > In addition could you please maintain a Wiki page what known serious > errors are available in certain releases? Then distributions can decide > if it is a good idea to upgrade to a certain version (at least without > applying additional patch

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0.3 -- when?

2011-08-31 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:37 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Was your suggestion agreed on? Come and get it... http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/download.shtml ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubsc