On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:50 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:49 +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
> > I found that in ~/.config/evolution/mail there are still references to
> > ~/.evolution/mail:
>
> mail/state.ini is safe to delete. It merely stores UI state for various
> folder
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:01 -0500, Lee Thao wrote:
> I am able to recieve emails and read them just fine but when I try to
> send an email I get:
>
> "The user account which was used to submit this request does not have
> the right to send mail on behalf of the specified sending account."
It look
I am able to recieve emails and read them just fine but when I try to send an
email I get:
"The user account which was used to submit this request does not have the right
to send mail on behalf of the specified sending account."
I have tried all sorts of combinations for the fields on both the
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:49 +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
> I found that in ~/.config/evolution/mail there are still references to
> ~/.evolution/mail:
mail/state.ini is safe to delete. It merely stores UI state for various
folders, such as whether the folder is expanded in the sidebar and which
me
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:42 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I'm sure you know this, but there is no "move" operation in IMAP - so a
> move is implemented as a "copy" and "mark as deleted". For what you are
> suggesting to work, then you need to end up the sequence with a "purge
> folder" so that the de
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> the bug is for IMAP, and technically makes sense only there, as it
> doesn't make any sense on exchange servers, for example, because it's
> user-configurable how the IMAP provider should behave, and that's the
> main point. For what would it b
> There is an open bug for Evolution generically, for using a "real trash
> folder" and actually moving messages to it instead of marking them for
> deletion. That was done as a dirty hack in the imap back end, where it
> notices the "mark for deletion" request and actually *moves* the message
> i
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Ideally, I would like messages to be moved to "Deleted Items" when I
> > delete them, but even the current way (marking them as deleted
> > instead), is OK to me.
>
> There is an open bug for Evolution generically, for using a "real
> t
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 20:02 +0300, Ruslan Tarasov wrote:
> > 1. There is no virtual Trash directory in a new EWS account. This
> > makes it hard to track deleted messages. As an alternative it would be
> > useful to move deleted mails to "
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 22:49 +0100, Ruslan Tarasov wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:27 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 20:02 +0300, Ruslan Tarasov wrote:
> >> 1. There is no virtual Trash directory in a new EWS account. This
> >> makes it hard to track deleted messages. As an
Hi,
I am using Evolution 2.32.2 that came default with Ubunt Natty 64 bit release.
There seems to be an issue when I am maximizing Evolution Window from a
minimized state. When I start my laptop and open Evolution, it works fine. When
I minimze the Evolution window it sits minimized on the unit
Hello,
I had used Ubuntu for some years. Some weeks ago when gnome 3 was
realesed I decided to switch to Archlinux.
So I'm now with archlinux 64 bits - gnome 3 with gnome-shell and
Evolution 3.0.1-1.
A search on body-content is very very slow.
I have to say that I have a hudge INBOX : ~18500
FreeBSD-7.4-RELEASE i386 / Gnome/Evolution 2.32.1.
I finally got around to looking at why my automatic contacts hasn't been
working lately and noticed that the Edit/Preferences dialogs list two
"On This Computer" entries although only one "On This Computer" account
is displayed in the folders pane
13 matches
Mail list logo
