[Evolution] evolution free busy alignment...

2011-04-02 Thread Aravind Hampiholi
hi, I am using ubuntu 10.10 with evolution 2.30.3. I have integrated the evolution to exchange using OWA option. I am seeing some misaligment in free/busy page, which makes it little difficult to read the status of each attendee. Is there any solution/workaround for this and has it been

Re: [Evolution] A Digression on Digests

2011-04-02 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 16:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > Nothing to do w/ corporate email or BB's. It's much easier to reply & > > it's much easier to read a sequence of emails that are top posted. Bull $#^*&@^#, top-post messages are harder to read. One has to remember that message are not alw

Re: [Evolution] A Digression on Digests

2011-04-02 Thread Pete Biggs
> Nothing to do w/ corporate email or BB's. It's much easier to reply & > it's much easier to read a sequence of emails that are top posted. Like hell it is - it is just overly confusing - how many times have you seen a message that is, in its entirety, something like "yes, I think that is corre

Re: [Evolution] A Digression on Digests

2011-04-02 Thread brad
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 09:40 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Nothing to do with Down Under. Corporate email is fixated on top-posting > as a way to record the entire history of a conversation (since no > trimming is done either). This is reinforced by email clients such as > Outlook and now many

Re: [Evolution] A Digression on Digests

2011-04-02 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 20:18 +1000, Peter Cave wrote: [Entire redundant quote of digest deleted] > I hope I am complying this time - am really unfamiliar with lists. You're not, see below. [...] > Intuitively my intention would be (as in this message) to reply to the > list but change the Subje

Re: [Evolution] A Digression on Digests

2011-04-02 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 20:18 +1000, Peter Cave wrote: > I hope I am complying this time - am really unfamiliar with lists. That's awesome. You quoted an entire digest message to reply to a thread about why digest messages are obsolete and evil and how we can prevent users from directly replying t

Re: [Evolution] A Digression on Digests

2011-04-02 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 09:38 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 20:18 +1000, Peter Cave wrote: > > I hope I am complying this time - am really unfamiliar with lists. > > That's awesome. You quoted an entire digest message to reply to a > thread about why digest messages are obso

Re: [Evolution] A Digression on Digests

2011-04-02 Thread Peter Cave
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:53 +, evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote: > Send evolution-list mailing list submissions to > evolution-list@gnome.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list > or, via emai