[Evolution] Building evolution plugins separately (WAS: filter && forwarding incoming mail)

2011-01-12 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 14:17 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:30 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > > do you have build capability -- the plugin itself is not very big > > > I've built Evo in the past, though doing it in Fedora is much less > automated than for Ubuntu (thanks

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:30 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:44 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 08:50 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > > > On 1/12/2011 8:48 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > >> I'm using Evo only for my business mails (because I hav

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Reid Thompson
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:44 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 08:50 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > > On 1/12/2011 8:48 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > >> I'm using Evo only for my business mails (because I have to), for > > >> > private and OpenSource stuff, I will stick

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 08:50 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > On 1/12/2011 8:48 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> I'm using Evo only for my business mails (because I have to), for > >> > private and OpenSource stuff, I will stick with mutt and vi(1); this may > >> > change when there is some vi-plu

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Reid Thompson
On 1/12/2011 8:48 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I'm using Evo only for my business mails (because I have to), for > private and OpenSource stuff, I will stick with mutt and vi(1); this may > change when there is some vi-pluging for writing mail with Evo:-) A composer hook has been mentioned a

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 12:13 +0100, Han Pilmeyer wrote: > Could it perhaps be made context sensitive or would that not be a good > GUI practice? > > For instance only offer "reply to list" if the message has a list, > "reply to all" if the message has multiple recipients, "undelete" if > the messag

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Pete Biggs
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 07:53 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 22:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:03 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > > > It would be nice if the right click on a message menu contained a "reply > > > to list" option, as does the main

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Albert Wagner
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 23:41 -0500 schrieb Philippe LeCavalier: > > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 22:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:03 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > > > > It would be nice if the right cli

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Albert Wagner
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 22:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:03 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > > It would be nice if the right click on a message menu contained a "reply > > to list" option, as does the main Message menu. > > Bugzilla. > > poc > Not a bug. Just a pre

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 09:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:30 +0100, Han Pilmeyer wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 06:27 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > Delete / Undelete show up in a context sensitive manner. > > > > > > It not being there is ok with me [Ctrl

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:30 +0100, Han Pilmeyer wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 06:27 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > Delete / Undelete show up in a context sensitive manner. > > > > It not being there is ok with me [Ctrl-L!]; context-menus easily > > bloat. > > Good point. So perhaps then

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:28 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, January 12, 2011 a las 11:58:29AM +, Pete Biggs > escribió: > > > Err, yes there is, at the bottom of the Action list: "Forward to:". If > > your version of Evo doesn't have it (and I wouldn't know what it is > >

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, January 12, 2011 a las 07:04:15AM -0600, Philippe LeCavalier escribió: > Quoting Matthias Apitz : > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I wanted to setup a filter in Evo which forwards incoming mail, based on > > the senders addr, to some other account... and I'm surprised that there

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Philippe LeCavalier
Quoting Matthias Apitz : Hello, I wanted to setup a filter in Evo which forwards incoming mail, based on the senders addr, to some other account... and I'm surprised that there is no action option for this, really? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-6130

Re: [Evolution] Feedback

2011-01-12 Thread Philippe LeCavalier
Quoting Pete Biggs : On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:11 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 14:02 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > I am a new evolution user on Ubuntu 10.10. An initial observation: mail > folders often show some unread when there are no unread. When I click to > mark

Re: [Evolution] Tasks in main window

2011-01-12 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:57 +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote: > Not sure how to ask this, so follow me if you can. > In Gmail, the Tasks window sits in the main inbox window, which is > intuitive because I can see my tasks (to-do) while viewing my mail. > The tasks are simplified, so I can read more by cli

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Han Pilmeyer
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 06:27 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Delete / Undelete show up in a context sensitive manner. > > It not being there is ok with me [Ctrl-L!]; context-menus easily > bloat. Good point. So perhaps then it would make sense to replace "Reply All" with "Reply List" when t

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, January 12, 2011 a las 11:58:29AM +, Pete Biggs escribió: > Err, yes there is, at the bottom of the Action list: "Forward to:". If > your version of Evo doesn't have it (and I wouldn't know what it is > because not only don't you tell us, but you used Mutt to send the mai

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Richard
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:41 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > That's a real shame, as Using POP3 I hold about 1.5 GB of mail, which if > > I filter on relative age I stop the mail file expanding to much by > > either deleting or moving to an archive. > > So if it's POP then all the mail you are interes

Re: [Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Pete Biggs
> > I wanted to setup a filter in Evo which forwards incoming mail, based on > the senders addr, to some other account... and I'm surprised that there > is no action option for this, really? > Err, yes there is, at the bottom of the Action list: "Forward to:". If your version of Evo doesn't ha

[Evolution] Tasks in main window

2011-01-12 Thread Jeremy Nell
Not sure how to ask this, so follow me if you can. In Gmail, the Tasks window sits in the main inbox window, which is intuitive because I can see my tasks (to-do) while viewing my mail. The tasks are simplified, so I can read more by clicking on them, but there is just enough for me to see and be

[Evolution] filter && forwarding incoming mail

2011-01-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I wanted to setup a filter in Evo which forwards incoming mail, based on the senders addr, to some other account... and I'm surprised that there is no action option for this, really? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Richard
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 07:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:10 +, Richard wrote: > > Thanks Andre > > Pete has answered my question. I've altered the sig block to include Evo > > version and OS, to aid future questions to the list > > Adding the Evo version to you

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Pete Biggs
> That's a real shame, as Using POP3 I hold about 1.5 GB of mail, which if > I filter on relative age I stop the mail file expanding to much by > either deleting or moving to an archive. So if it's POP then all the mail you are interested in is on your local machine - i.e. your mail is in the INB

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:10 +, Richard wrote: > Thanks Andre > Pete has answered my question. I've altered the sig block to include Evo > version and OS, to aid future questions to the list Adding the Evo version to your sig is redundant, given that the info is already in your mail headers if

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 12:13 +0100, Han Pilmeyer wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > I'd close it as WONTFIX anyway. For follow-up insults please refer > > to > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308829 :-P > > > Have I gone crazy or did a previous revision

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Han Pilmeyer
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > I'd close it as WONTFIX anyway. For follow-up insults please refer to > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308829 :-P > > > Have I gone crazy or did a previous revision have that feature? > > You are right. In version 2.1/2.2 the

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Richard
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 12:07 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 12.01.2011, 09:46 + schrieb Richard: > > Hi All > > I'm staring to find my way around now, but how do I get Evo to filter > > existing mail all folders. I can do this manually by highlighting the > > contents of each fol

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Richard
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 10:13 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > I'm staring to find my way around now, but how do I get Evo to filter > > existing mail all folders. I can do this manually by highlighting the > > contents of each folder, and filtering on date received. I would like > > it to do this on st

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Pete Biggs
> I'm staring to find my way around now, but how do I get Evo to filter > existing mail all folders. I can do this manually by highlighting the > contents of each folder, and filtering on date received. I would like > it to do this on start up automatically Evo will only filter "new" messages in

Re: [Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 12.01.2011, 09:46 + schrieb Richard: > Hi All > I'm staring to find my way around now, but how do I get Evo to filter > existing mail all folders. I can do this manually by highlighting the > contents of each folder, and filtering on date received. I would like > it to do this

[Evolution] Filtering

2011-01-12 Thread Richard
Hi All I'm staring to find my way around now, but how do I get Evo to filter existing mail all folders. I can do this manually by highlighting the contents of each folder, and filtering on date received. I would like it to do this on start up automatically -- Best wishes / 73 Richard Bown nil car

Re: [Evolution] Feedback

2011-01-12 Thread Pete Biggs
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:11 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 14:02 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > > I am a new evolution user on Ubuntu 10.10. An initial observation: mail > > folders often show some unread when there are no unread. When I click to > > mark all unread as r

Re: [Evolution] A suggested convenience feature

2011-01-12 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 23:41 -0500 schrieb Philippe LeCavalier: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 22:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:03 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > > > It would be nice if the right click on a message menu contained a "reply > > > to list" option, a

Re: [Evolution] Feedback

2011-01-12 Thread Han Pilmeyer
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 14:02 -0600, Albert Wagner wrote: > I am a new evolution user on Ubuntu 10.10. An initial observation: > mail > folders often show some unread when there are no unread. When I click > to > mark all unread as read, I get a dialog asking if I want > subdirectories > as well as