[Evolution] Question

Hi, I have a question about encryption from evolution site. Is it possible to encrypt outgoing message and using someone else public key than the receiver? Sometimes public key was generated for one e-mail but the same person has a few emails or aliases. Is it possible somehow to choose which ke

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:10 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > As to efficiency, I can't off-hand think of an obvious reason why > search > > folders should be faster than filters unless the criteria are just > > simpler. In fact I suspect it's more a matter of perception than > > reality, gi

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 02:41 +0100, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 03.11.2010, 19:14 -0400 schrieb Philippe LeCavalier: > > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:16 +, Steve T wrote: > > > Phil, > > > ... (although the message in the folder is marked as read ok). That > > > is apparently a kno

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:41 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > looking to see if offlineimap could filter, and found another alternative > use *imapfilter* > imapfilter does just what the name implies: it > filters email on IMAP servers. > The general idea is you have im

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

Am Mittwoch, den 03.11.2010, 14:45 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: > but IMHO they would be more useful if one could rearrange the folder > list to locate them where one wants, not just at the end. There exists a menu item Edit->Search Folders which brings up a window where you can rearrange

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

Am Mittwoch, den 03.11.2010, 19:14 -0400 schrieb Philippe LeCavalier: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:16 +, Steve T wrote: > > Phil, > > ... (although the message in the folder is marked as read ok). That > > is apparently a known issue in this release. > Very interesting. So you can continue your f

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:41 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > > looking to see if offlineimap could filter, and found another > alternative > use imapfilter > imapfilter does just what the name implies: it filters email on IMAP > servers. The general idea is you have imapfilter running via a cron >

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

looking to see if offlineimap could filter, and found another alternative use *imapfilter* imapfilter does just what the name implies: it filters email on IMAP servers. The general idea is you have imapfilter running via a cron job on some always-on computer. It is

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On 11/3/2010 7:10 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: I'm confused about this because my msg filters are moving the mail to the appropriate folders both locally and server-side so what difference would offlineimap bring? Read these two links and see if offlineimap will *fix* your concerns with speed

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:16 +, Steve T wrote: > Phil, > I am running evolution 2.28.3 under FC12 and I have always used search > folders since FC6. The only problems that I have (which seem to change > slightly when the database back end was introduced) is that with large > sets of criteria on

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:45 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 11/3/10 2:24 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:12 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > >> > > > > I omitted the previous discussion because of this... > > In the spirit of self-help I decided to play wit

[Evolution] Error while building Evolution 2.91

I'm trying to build Evolution 2.91.1. I downloaded the source with git and, after installing some other deps, successfully run ./autogen.sh. Then I tried the "make" commmand, it compiled for a while but I finally obtained the following error: [...] Making all in pst-import make[3]: ingresso nella

Re: [Evolution] PKCS11 in evolution

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 19:19 +0100, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:29 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 16:11 +0200, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote: > > The latter (~/.pki/nssdb) was the right one. > > > > I'd try debugging the certificate avai

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

Phil, I am running evolution 2.28.3 under FC12 and I have always used search folders since FC6. The only problems that I have (which seem to change slightly when the database back end was introduced) is that with large sets of criteria on a single folder, the search folders can be slow (both in the

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On 11/3/10 2:24 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:12 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: I omitted the previous discussion because of this... In the spirit of self-help I decided to play with Search Folders and I certainly answered my own question as to whther or not they

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:12 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > I omitted the previous discussion because of this... In the spirit of self-help I decided to play with Search Folders and I certainly answered my own question as to whther or not they're faster than mail filters - they are *allot*

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:12:00PM -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > I'm confused. I am using IMAP and I \m also using an IMAP client. Aren't the > local changes to the mail propagated back to the server jsut by using standard > IMAP? yes - they are. I reference offlineimap based on what's

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:19 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:35:29PM -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:03 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:25 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 21:16

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:35:29PM -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:03 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:25 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 21:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 10:

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:03 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:25 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 21:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 10:52 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > > > > I tend to store no mail on hosted accounts and

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:25 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 21:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 10:52 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > > > I tend to store no mail on hosted accounts and use fetchmail + > > > procmail to download and delete from server host

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Core Dump after update

On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 16:37 +, P Roq wrote: > After update my desktop my Evolution crash every time that I try to > use an evolution-exchange account. > > My current version is 2.28.3... Hi, well, this is not enough information. Please try to get backtrace of the crash (with debug inf