Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

2010-11-02 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 21:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 10:52 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > > I tend to store no mail on hosted accounts and use fetchmail + > > procmail to download and delete from server hosts. > > Each to his own. I store almost no mail locally, tha

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

2010-11-02 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 10:52 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > I tend to store no mail on hosted accounts and use fetchmail + > procmail to download and delete from server hosts. Each to his own. I store almost no mail locally, that way I can get to it from wherever I am (from my phone, from a friend's

Re: [Evolution] how to use Reply to List

2010-11-02 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:01 +1300, Victoria Spagnolo wrote: > I have received responses to my query about compiling but when trying to > reply the Message->"Reply to List" option is greyout out. > Why is that? Do I have something configured wrong? Reply-To-List only works when the message being re

Re: [Evolution] learning to compile, need help with finding dependecies in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-11-02 Thread Victoria Spagnolo
Thomas, I just found your detailed msgs in my SPAM filters. I will try them out later. thanks. > ___ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

[Evolution] how to use Reply to List

2010-11-02 Thread Victoria Spagnolo
I have received responses to my query about compiling but when trying to reply the Message->"Reply to List" option is greyout out. Why is that? Do I have something configured wrong? Cheers, V ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To cha

Re: [Evolution] learning to compile, need help with finding dependecies in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-11-02 Thread Victoria Spagnolo
> might be worth trying set as karmic. You'll also prob want to > explicitly set the branch to something less than master like 2.32??? Yes, I have done that and get a different list of needed dependencies plus this > ***Error***: some autoconf macros required to build libgweather > were not

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

2010-11-02 Thread Thomas Mittelstaedt
Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 09:33 -0400 schrieb Philippe LeCavalier: > Hi all, > > Which is better? I've always used filters to sort my mail into > folders. I detest a convoluted Inbox. However, and mostly recently, > I'm finding it painful to wait the amount of time it takes to filter > all my m

[Evolution] Evolution Core Dump after update

2010-11-02 Thread P Roq
Hi, After update my desktop my Evolution crash every time that I try to use an evolution-exchange account. My current version is 2.28.3... Anyone can help me ? Best Regards ! ___ evolution-list mailing list

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

2010-11-02 Thread Reid Thompson
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 09:33:24AM -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > Hi all, > > > -Also, I've always wondered if there wold be a possible way to implement > filtration(whichever method) server-side...Something along the line of SIEVE - > My understanding of which is > /dev/null. This may be su

[Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

2010-11-02 Thread Philippe LeCavalier
Hi all, Which is better? I've always used filters to sort my mail into folders. I detest a convoluted Inbox. However, and mostly recently, I'm finding it painful to wait the amount of time it takes to filter all my mail when I open Evo. I get quite a large amount of mail so I don't know whether or

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Gmail

2010-11-02 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 09:13 -0500, Christian wrote: > > just to add more fun to Pete and others in this thread: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206061#c103 > > > > Note this is for IMAP provider, not for the IMAP+. > > Thanks! I think we can all agree that Evo's support for Gmail is