On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> An obvious solution to this is to do what Kmail does. When the message
> being replied to contains a List-Post header, Ctrl-R should do the same
> as Ctrl-L. There should also be a Reply-To-Author command for the rare
> case when the r
I like your picture, I think that way is fine to me.
Sylvia
El jue, 15-07-2010 a las 16:57 +0100, David Woodhouse escribió:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Pa
It happens to me too. I think is a bug. Actually, the category is
created but not showed. Try to create another category with the same
name and the program will "It's already created". If you type in the
box above, your created categories appear. Also appears in calendar
view.
If nobody know
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Remember, the existing reply-to-list operation *already* falls back
> > to replying to all if it can't find a List-Post: header.
>
> No it doesn't.
The operation *does*. You're getting confused by the fact that the
current menu items get
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 20:54 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> My understanding *was* that those people who wanted reply-to-list
> would
> want to use it for *all* lists. Remember, the existing reply-to-list
> operation *already* falls back to replying to all if it can't find a
> List-Post: header.
N
>
> > Also I need a reply all for list messages when I get a CC: copy without
> > the list headers in the message.
>
> When you get a Cc copy without the list headers in the message, that
> *isn't* a list message in any meaningful sense of the term -- it's a
> direct message.
Yes, I understand
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:22 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > because even though your normal
> > preference is to reply-to-list on list messages, you might *sometimes*
> > want to reply-to-all on a list message instead?
>
> No, I need to reply all for normal messages - life isn't just about
> lists :
Greetings,
Using Evolution 2.30.2 on Debian Squeeze I attempt to create a new
category, assign an icon and create, however, the new category is not
created.
Similarly, when I delete the default categories I do not want, e.g,.
VIP, say ok then close. When I next reopen the categories all those I
d
> >
> > But Reply-to-All is useful, I don't want it to become a Reply-in-Public.
> > And the term Public is horrible - many of the lists I am on are private
> > lists, the reply is most definitely not public and it will just confuse
> > people.
>
> Remember, we're *only* talking about the toolba
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > And there are probably an equal number who believe the contrary, like
> > > me, but let's not argue about
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > And there are probably an equal number who believe the contrary, like
> > me, but let's not argue about it. I think Paul's suggestion that the
> > default behaviour for "Rep
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Note: this is a comment on Evo itself, rather than the Evo list.
> >
> > As someone who posts quite a lot on this list, I'm forever having to
> > deal with people reply
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 13:00 +1000, Nick Jenkins wrote:
> > > OK, let's summarize (RT = Reply-To address, LP = List-Post
> address,
> > > SA = Sender or From Address, CC = CC addresses):
> >
> > This all far too complicated.
>
> Agreed. If it's a user-facing change that too complicated to
> unders
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 13:24 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > And it's *already* simple for the user to choose if they're using the
> > keyboard shortcuts or the menu; it's only the toolbar that really needs
> > attention, as you say.
>
> Fine. So what's the point of all this discussion then? Ju
Hello,
I can see evolution store complete POP data base under local provider
storage.
Why this way it is implemented ??
Why don't he can use default directory of POP storage. (Created by
evolution during account connection).
Note : By default storage, i mean folder created by evolution
@/home.evo
>
> And it's *already* simple for the user to choose if they're using the
> keyboard shortcuts or the menu; it's only the toolbar that really needs
> attention, as you say.
Fine. So what's the point of all this discussion then? Just change the
toolbar.
>
> And despite the fact that I persona
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:15 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Let's not argue about that too much -- we won't make any progress. Let's
> > just recognise that this 'DTRT' thing that you suggest is hard when we
> > can't agree on what TRT is.
>
> Yes, but all your solutions seem to implement it the way
>
> My current inclination is to head down the KISS route - just put a
> Reply-to-list button on the toolbar that might possibly be greyed out if
> there is no list info. That seems to be simple, quick and easy to
> implement - it's just a patch to an XML file.
>
In fact I've just done it:
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:57 +0200, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote:
> First: Apologies, Pete, I accidentally replied off-list. Honestly, I
> didn't mean to. I just clicked the wrong reply button (the one I used
> the most).
:-)
> >
> > I would be strongly against any implementation that automat
First: Apologies, Pete, I accidentally replied off-list. Honestly, I
didn't mean to. I just clicked the wrong reply button (the one I used
the most).
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:15 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Let's not argue about that too much -- we won't make any progress.
Let's
> > just recogn
>
> The problem with that suggestion is that there are people (including
> myself) who firmly believe that the "right" thing to do with a list
> message is to *include* the original sender when replying, unless you're
> sure they don't want you to.
And I very firmly believe that CC'ing someone w
21 matches
Mail list logo
