Hi,
As subject. I need something more powerful than the standard address
book editor. I have approx 80-100 addressees in a standard vcf file.
Many are duplicates and have the data in the wrong fields.
Also adding an address to the 'Ubuntu One' address book gives this
error:
Cannot add new contac
It isnt a standard 2003 exchange - there are some local mods to the OWA
signon that outlook and davmail can handle, but evolution cant, even
though they seem trivial. Mind you, it took the latest subversion
version of davmail to work.
BillK
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:45 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 20:21 +0200, Florian Götz wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I´m new to Evolution, but till now I´m really happy with it ;)
> A reason for that is the write support for LDAP adressbooks(great job).
>
> I use an OpenLDAP Server (2.4.x) for storing my adresses. The scheme
> used is th
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:23 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> But if the message is displayed (by double-clicking) in its own
> window, pressing "Display the next message" in the message window
> displays the next message in the folder. This behavior is new, at
> least since evolution-2.26, and (I
If some messages are selected by using the Search box, and one is
displayed in the Preview pane, pressing "Display the next message" in
the main window causes the preview pane to display the next selected
message.
But if the message is displayed (by double-clicking) in its own window,
pressing "
Hi everybody,
I´m new to Evolution, but till now I´m really happy with it ;)
A reason for that is the write support for LDAP adressbooks(great job).
I use an OpenLDAP Server (2.4.x) for storing my adresses. The scheme
used is the evolutionPerson.scheme that comes with evolution. Everything
fine s
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I tried DavMail last fall for about 30m and couldn't get it working
> right so I gave up--too quickly I admit. Maybe I'll give it another
> go.
The trick is the url for your mailbox, calendar, etc.
>
> FWIW, I still use lookOut! 2003, not
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:49 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> DavMail works well with 2007 & evolution if you don't want to use
> lookout. Lookout 2007 is admittedly bloated, but seems to have a
> superior interface to any prior version. I run it for group
> calendaring under VirtualBox.
I tried DavMa
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:51 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I've already added my 2 cents but for anybody trying to limit libs in
> > the hopes of running a "clean" system. NM adds lost of unwanted
> > packages. On the other hand, if you're already running Gnome then you
> > really should u
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 23:02 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Then my company switched to Exchange 2007 and I've had to use lookOut!
> inside Crossover Linux ever since :-/.
>
>
DavMail works well with 2007 & evolution if you don't want to use
lookout. Lookout 2007 is admittedly bloated, but seems to
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 22:59 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 06:45 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > IMAP is for reading mail, SMTP is for sending (most likely). I've
> not
> > heard of IMAP being useable for sending email.
>
> Yes, you're right. What I meant was that my exchange server
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 20:26 -0400, William Kenworthy wrote:
>
> Ive never been able to get evolution mapi or evolution exchange
> working
> to exchange 2003! - evo ver 2.26, I have just upgraded to gnome 2.28
> and
> will retry it again soon, but dont hold out much hope.
I found the evolution-exc
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:13 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 08:32 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > Up to a point. Two issues with NM are 1) for a long time it had almost
> > no user-oriented documentation (a man page that boils down to "it just
> > works" doe
Well, now is working fine and I hope it stays in that good way. There's
what I do:
* I uninstall Network Manager.
* In Evolution, configure it to connect directly to the
internet.
* I've install Wicd but I don't understand it. Anyway,
Evolution
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 08:32 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Up to a point. Two issues with NM are 1) for a long time it had almost
> no user-oriented documentation (a man page that boils down to "it just
> works" doesn't count), and 2) the point about easily determining
> connectivity is on
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 06:54 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:23 -0400, Robert K. Tompsett - N8JUQ wrote:
> > In reference to Evolution "Pete Biggs" What is the WICD and NM in
> > reference to?
>
> NM is the fabulous Network Manager. I've never had it malfunction, and
>
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:23 -0400, Robert K. Tompsett - N8JUQ wrote:
> In reference to Evolution "Pete Biggs" What is the WICD and NM in
> reference to?
NM is the fabulous Network Manager. I've never had it malfunction, and
it is a serious component of why the LINUX desktop (GNOME) a usable
deskt
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:23 -0400, Robert K. Tompsett - N8JUQ wrote:
> In reference to Evolution "Pete Biggs" What is the WICD and NM in
> reference to?
What? Why have you mentioned my name here? What is this to do with me?
P.
___
evolution-list mail
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 08:41 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 09:08 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > That is bad news for me. As NM is very imperfect I simply do not use it
> > > at all. It doesn't allow me to configure many things I used to set up
> > > in /etc/interfaces lik
19 matches
Mail list logo
