On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 08:32 -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
>
> 3. POP allows for offline access of emails (already received, of
> course), IMAP does not (but most clients will offer the option for
> local storage of email).
If you use offlineimap (great software!), you get IMAP offline anytime
you wa
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 14:00 -0500, Barbara Tobias wrote:
> Almost all of the items in my "sent" folder have suddenly disappeared.
> I have recent backups but do not know how to restore only that one
> folder. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks!
1) Is your Sent folder local or re
Almost all of the items in my "sent" folder have suddenly disappeared.
I have recent backups but do not know how to restore only that one
folder. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks!
Barbara Tobias
___
Evolution-list mailing li
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 11:37 -0500, Bryan Karlan wrote:
> I have asked several times to be removed from this list. Nobody has done
> so. Please remove me.
Did you actually read the digest you're quoting? Read the instructions
and follow them.
And don't reply to list digests.
poc
__
I have asked several times to be removed from this list. Nobody has done
so. Please remove me.
-Original Message-
From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org
[mailto:evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of
evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:56 AM
To: e
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 16:45 +, Paul Leyland wrote:
> > Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> > need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my single
> > machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation messages.
> > I keep my fol
> Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my single
> machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation messages.
> I keep my folders quite small in size/number of messages. I have a huge
> d
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:34 -0600, Bart wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > > > Hope this is not too far off topic.
> > > > I am using pop fo
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 07:51 +, Steve T wrote:
> Apologies for the delay in replying - I thought I had replied a couple
> of days back (it's my age)!
You did.
poc
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:34:22 -0600
Bart wrote:
> Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my
> single machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation
> messages. I keep my folders quite s
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:34 -0600, Bart wrote:
> Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my single
> machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation messages.
> I keep my folders quite small
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 23:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:23 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > Re-sending, as original doesn't appear to have made it to the list.
>
> It did. Did you check the archives before resending?
>
I did ;) - wasn't there when I looked.
___
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > > Hope this is not too far off topic.
> > > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one
>
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 23:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:23 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > Re-sending, as original doesn't appear to have made it to the list.
>
> It did. Did you check the archives before resending?
>
I found it in my spam bin...
P.
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 11:52 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 16:11 +, Steve T wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 09:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 07:11 +, Steve T wrote:
> > > > > As long as you copy everything while neither Evo no
15 matches
Mail list logo
