> My understanding is that the RPM based distros like newer Fedoras have
> also figured out how to get this kind of stability, for the most part; I
> don't use them so I can't say.
A long time ago. Package management on all current mainstream
distributions is equivalent. You can practically use
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:12 -0700, bg wrote:
> Athlon 2.6 with 1Gb RAM, 160Gb RAID Level 1 array.
>
would work fine for ubuntu or gentoo depending on what effort you want
to put into your distro
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 14:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Anyway, FYI nothing happens _automatically_; what happens is when
> there
> are packages available for upgrade you get an icon in your
> notification
> area[*] which you can select to open the update manager. You can then
> choose whether to i
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:12 -0700, bg wrote:
> > what specs does your box have?
>
> Athlon 2.6 with 1Gb RAM, 160Gb RAID Level 1 array.
>
> I've been experimenting with Ubuntu 8.10 on another machine.
> One of the things that both looks attractive about Ubuntu,
> and also generates a bit of appreh
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:22, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:03:18AM -0700, bg wrote:
> >
> > Older than dirt - Core2.
> >
> > It's pretty stable, though. The only real problem that's beginning
> > to get annoying is the Mozilla 1.7 browser, with the increasing
> > number of we
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 18:14 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > I'm probably going to be upgrading within the next 30 days.
> > I've been considering Ubuntu 9.04. Any suggestions?
>
> Within the next 30 days ? Wait for Ubuntu 9.10, this one will come with
> LTS (Long Term Support), and apparently that
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:22:15PM -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> And the make scripts provided by
> Paul/others makes running from git ( if you have the desire ) fairly
^
evolution
> straightforward.
_
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:03:18AM -0700, bg wrote:
>
> Older than dirt - Core2.
>
> It's pretty stable, though. The only real problem that's beginning
> to get annoying is the Mozilla 1.7 browser, with the increasing
> number of web pages it refuses to read, even with as late a
> vintage plug-i
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:03 -0700, bg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 18:09 -0700, bg wrote:
> > > Maybe my version of Evo is
> > > too ancient (a distinct possibility)
>
> Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
> > Wow .. you're using "Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2)" !!
> > I didn't known it was possible to
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 18:09 -0700, bg wrote:
> > Maybe my version of Evo is
> > too ancient (a distinct possibility)
Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Wow .. you're using "Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2)" !!
> I didn't known it was possible to still use such an ancient beast. How
> old is your linux dis
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:48 -0700, David L wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:08 AM, bg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:12, Ben May wrote:
> >
> > Likewise. I can't believe there are so many people who think you
> > have to "reconfigure" an email program in order to move the cursor
> > anywhere
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > The way most emailers default in the reply edit mode is to position
> > your cursor at the top of the original. The reason this is done
> > is apparently, unaccountably, non-obvious to millions of the
> > NetNewbies of the past sever
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 15:48 -0400, Steven Sprague wrote:
> Hell List,
> I have tried to setup a Webdav group calendar and use it with Apache -
> fails.
> I also tried to setup/create a Caldav calendar on the same server - not
> using Apache - fails.
> Does anyone have a setup for a group calendar
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 01:34 -0400, John Affleck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:48:55PM -0400, Steven Sprague wrote:
> > I have tried to setup a Webdav group calendar and use it with Apache -
> > fails.
> > I also tried to setup/create a Caldav calendar on the same server - not
> > using Apache
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 18:09 -0700, bg wrote:
> Maybe my version of Evo is
> too ancient (a distinct possibility)
Wow .. you're using "Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2)" !!
I didn't known it was possible to still use such an ancient beast. How
old is your linux distro ?
Xav
_
15 matches
Mail list logo
