On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 19:00 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:03 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > Did you follow the instructions on the tin, i.e. run Vacuum with Evo
> > > completely shut down?
> >
> > I don't remember, but I suspect evolution *was* running
>
> If
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 18:10 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
One of my important folders , containing about 4000 messages, was
moved into a subfolder of another folder and all the messages in
were deleted. The messages are truly gone; unchecking "Hid
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 18:01 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> If there are 418389 messages in total, of which 418344 are unread, then
> that means you've read 45 of them, doesn't it?
LOL. Yeah, that's what the counts are saying. As I have maintained,
they are way wrong, have been since the sql
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:03 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Did you follow the instructions on the tin, i.e. run Vacuum with Evo
> > completely shut down?
>
> I don't remember, but I suspect evolution *was* running
If so, that would explain why the db got messed up. For future
reference: *alwa
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:17 -0600, Kojak T wrote:
> How was your Back-up made?
> from within Evolution, or just a copy of the folder?
>
> personally, I use the internal back-up in Evolution to one file as
> extra, and use rsync to an external drive.
> Actually I do that for my complete /home fo
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 18:10 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > One of my important folders , containing about 4000 messages, was
> > moved into a subfolder of another folder and all the messages in
> > were deleted. The messages are truly gone; unchecking "Hide Deleted
> >
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 17:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 14:35 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > This may possibly be related to some maintenance I did on evolution
> > just before this happened, namely emptying the trash (File->Empty
> > Trash) and vacuuming the datab
How was your Back-up made?
from withing Evolution, or just a copy of the folder?
personally, I use the internal back-up in Evolution to one file as
extra, and use rsync to an external drive.
Actually I do hat for my complete /home folder except my virtual
machines.
I run that every day, it wi
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 14:35 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> This may possibly be related to some maintenance I did on evolution
> just before this happened, namely emptying the trash (File->Empty
> Trash) and vacuuming the database (as shown at the bottom).
Did you follow the instructions on the
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
One of my important folders , containing about 4000 messages, was
moved into a subfolder of another folder and all the messages in
were deleted. The messages are truly gone; unchecking "Hide Deleted
Messages" does not show them.
What type of account is Phred in? IMAP,
One of my important folders , containing about 4000 messages, was
moved into a subfolder of another folder and all the messages in
were deleted. The messages are truly gone; unchecking "Hide Deleted
Messages" does not show them.
Fortunately I have a backup of my entire system as of just before t
2009/8/24 Brian J. Murrell :
> On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 15:03 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
>> [snip] "...aggregates all of my newsgroups says there are 418389 messages in
>> it
>> with 418344 unread (i.e. only 5 unread messages -- yeah right). However
>> I know the difference bet..." [snip]
>>
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 15:03 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> Peter and Brian: I think you should reserve your angry complaints to
> your resellers, if any.
Huh?
> Brian: Your bug report 582945, is one that requires quite a bit of
> work just to reproduce
Not at all. Simply subscribe to a bun
Peter and Brian: I think you should reserve your angry complaints to
your resellers, if any.
Brian: Your bug report 582945, is one that requires quite a bit of
work just to reproduce and the very nature of the bug might prevent it
from getting a very high priority. You say it only affects users wi
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 21:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> Your BZ report talks about issues with large newsgroups.
Indeed.
> Are you seeing
> the same with large mail folders?
I don't have any/enough mail folders that compete with the quantity/size
of newsgroups.
> I have one IMAP fold
15 matches
Mail list logo
