Re: [Evolution] Testing evolution-mapi

2009-04-01 Thread Joshua Duan (CI/AFR-SG)
Suman Manjunath wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 17:49, Mark Intyre wrote: Still no success. I am actually testing against a cluster of Exchange 2007 servers which are part of a service Microsoft is providing and there is also load balancing in use. Is there anything in this setup which could

Re: [Evolution] Alarm notification not showing for Exchange

2009-04-01 Thread Daniel Castro
hi! anyone else have any ideas on what i could do to fix this? thanks! 2009/3/31 Daniel Castro > Hi All, > > After doing a lot of googleing and spending a lot of time troubleshooting > and before I open a bug on bugzilla I think I could find an answer on this > mailing list. > > I have Ubuntu 8.

[Evolution] PST import plugin for Evolution added

2009-04-01 Thread evo-list
>I have committed a PST Importer for Evolution. >Do let us know your experiences and suggestions. I realize that most if not 99.9% of the users here are Linux users for Evo, and while I am a Linux user, others in my office are not, and I am trying to get away from ms products as much as possibl

Re: [Evolution] Feedback about webkit editor

2009-04-01 Thread Ruchir Brahmbhatt
jacob.org] > > -- next part -- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 197 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > URL: > <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-l

Re: [Evolution] Feedback about webkit editor

2009-04-01 Thread Ruchir Brahmbhatt
ill be merged back to evolution later (hopefully). > > > -- > Johnny [johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org] > > -- next part -- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available &

Re: [Evolution] Feedback about webkit editor

2009-04-01 Thread Ruchir Brahmbhatt
cob.org] > > -- next part -- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 197 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > URL: > <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Feedback about webkit editor

2009-04-01 Thread Bharath Acharya
h > will be merged back to evolution later (hopefully). > > > -- > Johnny [johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org] > > -- next part -- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: applicatio

Re: [Evolution] Testing evolution-mapi

2009-04-01 Thread Suman Manjunath
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 17:49, Mark Intyre wrote: > Still no success. I am actually testing against a cluster of Exchange 2007 > servers which are part of a service Microsoft is providing and there is also > load balancing in use. Is there anything in this setup which could cause this > connecti

Re: [Evolution] Feedback about webkit editor

2009-04-01 Thread Ruchir Brahmbhatt
evolution later (hopefully). -- Johnny [johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org] -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.gnome.org/

Re: [Evolution] Feedback about webkit editor

2009-04-01 Thread Ruchir Brahmbhatt
- Johnny [johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org] -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/attac

Re: [Evolution] evolution MAPI provider required

2009-04-01 Thread Muhammad Sharfuddin
>Are you sure POP is disabled by your administrator? Yes Sir >It sounds to me >like your Outlook co-workers are either using POP, or have Outlook's >Auto-Archive feature enabled. >Auto-Archive *moves* mail from the Exchange server to a local or network >PST file. PST is the file format Outlook

Re: [Evolution] Testing evolution-mapi

2009-04-01 Thread Mark Intyre
Hello, > > > using following connection parameters I just get > > > MAPI_E_NETWORK_ERROR: > > > > > > Server Type: Exchange MAPI > > > Server: mail.example.com > > > Username: userid > > > Domain name: DOMAIN > > > > > > Are those parameters in correct form or should I use > > > something else? >