Re: [Evolution] Evolution ghastly slow.

2008-08-23 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 18:35 -0700, MHR wrote: > I just timed a small email message save to a local sub-subfolder of my > main local folder: 16-17 seconds. This is a small email message being > saved to a 62MB folder. That's definitely off. 62MB is nothing and saving a small message to it shouldn'

Re: [Evolution] Evolution ghastly slow.

2008-08-23 Thread MHR
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:23 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> It's important to say what *kind* of folder. Is it local or remote? If >> local, is it an mbox and if so how big is it? Has it been expunged >>

Re: [Evolution] Evolution ghastly slow.

2008-08-23 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 10:58 -0700, Mark Hull-Richter wrote: > I'm running Evolution for my mailer on CentOS 5.2 (yes, I know it's OLD, > but it's supposed to be STABLE), Evo v. 2.12.3, and I'm seeing the most > horrendously slow responses when I save an email to a folder. Some are > quick, but mos

[Evolution] Evolution ghastly slow.

2008-08-23 Thread Mark Hull-Richter
I'm running Evolution for my mailer on CentOS 5.2 (yes, I know it's OLD, but it's supposed to be STABLE), Evo v. 2.12.3, and I'm seeing the most horrendously slow responses when I save an email to a folder. Some are quick, but most of them are awfully slow, and there are only a small few that are