On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Roy Leembruggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Although automatic hardware detection has come a long way since earlier
> versions of Linux, perhaps the following problem/solution would be
> worthy of comment from Linux users.
>
> My older PC (Windows XP) has a pecu
Although automatic hardware detection has come a long way since earlier
versions of Linux, perhaps the following problem/solution would be
worthy of comment from Linux users.
My older PC (Windows XP) has a peculiar monitor connected to it, namely
an LCD-TFT type used as both TV Monitor / VGA pc
I'm running 2.0.2 on my office box and just migrated from a very elderly
home system running Evo 1.something to an AMD64 Gentoo box running
2.22.2 In all cases the default security level is/was to sign messages
before sending.
Both of the old versions had a check box for saving the pass phrase fo
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 15:51 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 08:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > So the stored summary implicitly assumes the off_t size? I have to say
> > that I had no problems moving from a 32-bit to a 64-bit system and
> > preserving all my local mail, so
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 08:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> So the stored summary implicitly assumes the off_t size? I have to say
> that I had no problems moving from a 32-bit to a 64-bit system and
> preserving all my local mail, so I'm not sure there's really an issue
> here (going the other
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:03 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 22:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > A 32-bit system might give a different result but I don't have one to
> > test. In any case, if there is a difference I would assume it to be
> > caused by an address-space limit
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 22:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> A 32-bit system might give a different result but I don't have one to
> test. In any case, if there is a difference I would assume it to be
> caused by an address-space limitation (or lack of available swap) rather
> than a problem wit
