Re: [Evolution] Expunging

2008-06-26 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 20:58 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > I assume this question has been asked before, maybe it is even in some > FAQ. I am short of disk space and ~/.evolution is the main cause of > this. Trying to reduce the size of folders I delete a lot of mails, but > the largest folders can

[Evolution] Expunging

2008-06-26 Thread Svante Signell
I assume this question has been asked before, maybe it is even in some FAQ. I am short of disk space and ~/.evolution is the main cause of this. Trying to reduce the size of folders I delete a lot of mails, but the largest folders cannot be expunged due to the lack of disk space. Is there an option

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread R Daly
Matthew Barnes wrote: > > Grab a newer glib2 package from Fedora 9? No idea if that will work, > but rpm should catch any package conflicts before any damage is done. > Well, I can't really do that or else the RHEL system would fall out of support with Red Hat. I'd need to keep the base pack

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:12 -0700, R Daly wrote: > Ooh boy... RHEL 5.2 only has 2.12.3. See below: > > : server23 166#; rpm -q glib2 > glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 > > Any suggestions on a workaround for that? Grab a newer glib2 package from Fedora 9? No idea if that will work, but rpm should catch any

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread R Daly
Matthew Barnes wrote: > > Sounds like the MAPI backend needs to update or start using versioned > package dependencies. GIO is a new I/O library in GLib 2.16. > Ooh boy... RHEL 5.2 only has 2.12.3. See below: : server23 166#; rpm -q glib2 glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 Any suggestions on a workaround

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 06:38 -0700, R Daly wrote: > I haven't had the time yet to look for where gio/gio.h may be. If you read > this prior to another update from me and can point me in the right > direction, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, again! Sounds like the MAPI backend needs to update or start

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > Hmm, we don't need perl for the provider. Please try this. > > > --- evolution-mapi-provider.spec 2008-06-26 13:29:46.0 +0530 > +++ evolution-mapi-provider.spec.corrected2008-06-26 08:02:04.0 > +0530 > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > # norootforbuild >

Re: [Evolution] "Lost connection to back-end Exchange process"

2008-06-26 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 22:05 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote: > I use Evolution to connect to my work Exchange server, both from a home > machine and a work machine. I get the above error message quite > frequently, about 10 times a day at home and 2 or 3 from work. It means > that I can't receive new me

Re: [Evolution] "Lost connection to back-end Exchange process"

2008-06-26 Thread Art Alexion
This was a problem with some versions. I have not had the problem on SLED 10.1/Evo 2.6 nor Ubuntu 8.04/Evo 2.22.2. On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 17:05 -0400, Peter Saffrey wrote: > I use Evolution to connect to my work Exchange server, both from a home > machine and a work machine. I get the above erro

[Evolution] "Lost connection to back-end Exchange process"

2008-06-26 Thread Peter Saffrey
I use Evolution to connect to my work Exchange server, both from a home machine and a work machine. I get the above error message quite frequently, about 10 times a day at home and 2 or 3 from work. It means that I can't receive new messages or read those that I haven't already selected during a se