Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 12:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Sure, but sometimes you have to ask a naive question to get at what is > really meant. No problem. If you have seen this bug you might want to add yourself to the CC list so you get notified of new information. Peace! --

Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-27 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 11:11 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 08:22 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I'm missing something here. How can Evo "try to display the message" > > when the CPU is idle? When the CPU is idle nobody is doing anything > > except waiting. > > You're bein

Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 08:22 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I'm missing something here. How can Evo "try to display the message" > when the CPU is idle? When the CPU is idle nobody is doing anything > except waiting. You're being far too literal. What I mean is, if you don't notice any seriou

Re: [Evolution] evolution's startup time

2007-10-27 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
Hi Jeff, On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 10:48 -0400, Jeff Shanahan wrote: > I'm using Ubuntu Linux and I have no problem. Maybe it's the Beta free > BSD that you are using. Okay I'll contact FreeBSD GNOME Team, thanks! -- "OK. Then I have to kill him." -- Michael Corleone, "Chapter 11",

[Evolution] evolution's startup time

2007-10-27 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
Folks, I did upgrade Evo to 2.12, but the startup is very slow. The time is about 120 seconds. Any comments? Here is the details: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> uname -a FreeBSD viola.izb.knu.ac.kr 7.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1 #3: Wed Oct 24 00:58:37 KST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC

Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-27 Thread Todd Ness
What is really interesting since I restarted evo with the debug setting it has ran all the rest of yesterday into this morning... On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 08:22 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 00:59 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Note that in order to be this bug, the CPU must

Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-27 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 00:59 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Note that in order to be this bug, the CPU must be > active while Evo tries to display the message. If the CPU is idle > it's something else (you didn't mention either way). I'm missing something here. How can Evo "try to display the message"