On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 00:35 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> There should really be some more
I find it difficult to argue with this last point :)
--
Daniel Kasak
IT Developer
NUS Consulting Group
Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922
hi,
i am using evolution now for some years and i must say i was absolutely
happy about it, as it fit my needs: i used some pop3/smtp accounts and
the perfect integration to my favorite desktop environment just made my day.
But some days ago i realized, that i had now 4 machines in different
lo
Hi,
On Mi, 2007-08-22 at 11:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 11:51 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> > Being nice and informative towards the user is
> > the key issue here, not brutally follow standards.
>
> The standards aren't enforced by Evo, all Evo is doing is assuming tha
Hi Paul/others,
I have cooked up a patch for addressing this issue. After a lot of code
reading/MS KB articles, this patch should be able to address the issue
of mails getting disappeared.
Paul: Will it be possible for you to run a quick test on this patch and
report back? The patch can be dow
I've been using Evo with my LDAP for a couple years and I love the
functionality - especially since I can get to my contacts from anywhere
on the internet using any OS and MUA (that supports LDAP) since I have
my LDAP server exposed. But ... it locks/freezes on a fairly regular
basis. It seems to
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 11:51 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> ons 2007-08-22 klockan 10:27 +0100 skrev Pete Biggs:
>
> > > Can someone reproduce this? It's clearly a bug (if I'm correct)
> > >
> >
> > Why is it 'clearly a bug'? The mail standard says that recipients are
> > separated by commas wi
ons 2007-08-22 klockan 10:27 +0100 skrev Pete Biggs:
> > Can someone reproduce this? It's clearly a bug (if I'm correct)
> >
>
> Why is it 'clearly a bug'? The mail standard says that recipients are
> separated by commas with the semi-colon being used to terminate a group
> of mailboxes to be d
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 13:13 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> I noticed when sending to multiple recipents that separating recipients
> with ';' and ',' wasn't the same. I'm using version 2.11.90
>
> When using ';' only the first recipient got the mail
> When using ',' everyone got it.
>
> Can some
