On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 15:46 -0400, Don Levey wrote:
> I'm running Evolution on several machines which access the same mail
> account, depending upon my location. Ideally, I'd like to use the same set
> of rules to move incoming messages into IMAP folders. I've got this working
> on one machine; i
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 13:22 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:42 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > > > Your system configuration does not match your Evolution
> > > > configuration.
>
> This means that your /etc/bonobo-activation/bonobo-activation-config.xm
I'm running Evolution on several machines which access the same mail
account, depending upon my location. Ideally, I'd like to use the same set
of rules to move incoming messages into IMAP folders. I've got this working
on one machine; is there a way to simply transfer these rules as a set, to
an
I'm trying to set up CalDAV calendars in Win32 Evolution, and it won't
connect. My suspicion is that this is due to not entering the password for
the remote connection, but I'm not presented with the password dialog as I
am on the Linux version. Does anyone know where I might enter that (or,
alte
> Again excuse my frustration; I am a Linux user at a large (40k+
> employees) corporation (using Exchange) and take every opportunity to
> let others know of my Evolution successes, hoping that it's use will
> grow.
>
> Is there any possibility 2.8 will be released for FC5?
>
> -Lee
>
I don't
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 14:27 -0400, J. Lee Dixon wrote:
> Is there any possibility 2.8 will be released for FC5?
No, I'm afraid Fedora Core 5 is stuck with Evolution 2.6.
Perhaps one of the developers can comment on the status of 2.6.4?
Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:42 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:56 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > AFAIK, no there isn't, but it would be nice.
> > >
> > > No doubt purists will object that this constit
Don't take this the wrong way, but this is something that has frustrated
me for a while about evolution, even though I'm a HUGE fan.
I really want to be able to say that Evolution is great for corporate
use, but it's hard to say that when one can't get an update to connector
(vital for corporate u
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:53 -0400, J. Lee Dixon wrote:
> Any idea on the status of 2.6.4 showing up in the "updates" or
> "updates-testing" repo? Is there another repo I should be looking at?
To my knowledge there is no 2.6.4 yet, and I'm not sure there will ever
be now that Evolution 2.8 is out.
I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to post this:
I've been waiting on an update before upgrading via yum for FC5 dealing
with bug 349413 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349413)
Note #32 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349413#c32) says the
update will be availa
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:56 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > AFAIK, no there isn't, but it would be nice.
> >
> > No doubt purists will object that this constitutes modifying the message
> > (and invalidating any digital signatures
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 11:49 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 09:52 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 19:12 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 08:17 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > > > Is this number of open files expected? Why?
>
Hi,
Il try to install the new version to evolution to win32, but when i
launch it evolution not run.
They are prerequis to run it ?
Best regards
--
Christophe Mailhebuau,
Direction du Système d'Information
Conseil Régional d'Aquitaine
Tel : 05.57.57.82.21
13 matches
Mail list logo
