I've got an old exchange calendar (2 actually) that still shows up under
an exchange account that has long since been disabled. Yet I cannot get
the calendar to be removed in evo. I've even tried removing the
evolution-connector rpm, to no avail.
What's really killing me right now though is that I
Could this problem is related to this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273627
I thought that my problem was that Exchange name != mailbox name, but
the trace posted on that bug also shows a server name change. I'm also
Seeing the Unexpected kerberos error.
If someone can tell m
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:17 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I agree, and this has been mentioned several times in the past. The big
> > problem as I see it is that there is no *standard* way of telling a mail
> > server what is junk and
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:43 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 00:01 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> >
> > > - rant on -
> > > html email is only evil 5-7 years ago. Or, today for systems and users
> > > that measure storage
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 10:55 -0700, Paul Lemmons wrote:
> After digging a bit on the net I found the answer to this one at:
>
> http://sarwiki.informatik.hu-berlin.de/Thawte_certificate_with_own_private_key
>
> There are a number of hoops to jump through but they do work.
[signature]
Nice, you
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:40 -0700, Paul Lemmons wrote:
> I have a Thawte email certificate and would like to use it with
> Evolution 2.6.1. Anybody else out there got this working?
Yep. See below :-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:16 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Run your own mail server. Lots of people do it, and it's not as
> hard as you think. It also lets you pull mail from your ISP on
> a regular basis, whether you are logged in or not.
>
> Usually (always?) it's run in concert with spamassassi
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I agree, and this has been mentioned several times in the past. The big
> problem as I see it is that there is no *standard* way of telling a mail
> server what is junk and what isn't. Remember that many mail hubs don't
> allow the use
