Dear List and Guenther,
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 01:15 +0100, guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 18:59 -0500, George Reeke wrote:
> > Dear Guenther,
> >Thanks. I'm not sure why I couldn't find your posting with
> > the search on the gnome archives, but let's forget that for now.
>
> The da
I'm using version 2.4.2.1. I may have figured out what the problem is. There
is a bug (313725)
where recurring appointments do not show up when sent from a Groupwise account.
So the
appointments were created, just not displayed correctly.
I do find it confusing though that when I create a rec
Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 10:25 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
hi ron,
Am Donnerstag, den 26.01.2006, 21:06 -0800 schrieb Ron Eggler (Mobile):
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.01.2006, 03:06 -0600 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > Prior to v2.4, they are called vFolders.
> Sorry, I gotta dig a bit deeper here,
Is there a reason why, when navigating the filesystem via (say) the file
attach dialog that remote gnome-vfs filesystems are not available? In
many other applications I can navigate to a remote server that I have
configured. Not so in evolution. It's quite annoying to have to open a
remote files
Hello,
I have been facing a problem with Spam Assassin and Evolution integration.
My Evolution runs 24/7 on my computer and from time to time I have to restart it due to high memory consumption. I have noticed that the evolution task usually takes about 950 MiB after some time runnin
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:36 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Last tricky one. What if I have 20 known (repeating) spam messages, can
> I Junk them over and over again to up the count on those specific
> contents?
> In other words, if I have messages I get over and over again, can I
> "fool" SA by marking the
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 19:27 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
> > Ok, but still, won't marking "new" messages as not-Junk also make SA do
> > the analysis?
> I'm not 100% sure. But remember, filters err on the side of caution - if
> it's not sure it won't flag it as junk. Hence telling it something isn'
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 01:51 +0100, guenther wrote:
> A hack-ish workaround to train Bayes using Evo is the following: Pick at
> least 200 non-Junk messages, and keep them in mind. Now mark them as
> Junk using the Evo UI. Go to your Junk folder, and mark all those
> non-Junk mail we just abused in
hi ron,
Am Donnerstag, den 26.01.2006, 21:06 -0800 schrieb Ron Eggler (Mobile):
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.01.2006, 03:06 -0600 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > Prior to v2.4, they are called vFolders.
> Sorry, I gotta dig a bit deeper here, I still don't really know how to search
> a message globel in Evolut
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 19:27 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
> Hans wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 18:37 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
> >
> > Ok, but still, won't marking "new" messages as not-Junk also make SA do
> > the analysis?
> I'm not 100% sure. But remember, filters err on the side of caution -
Hans wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 18:37 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Ok, but still, won't marking "new" messages as not-Junk also make SA do
the analysis?
I'm not 100% sure. But remember, filters err on the side of caution - if
it's not sure it won't flag it as junk. Hence telling it something i
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 18:37 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Ok, but still, won't marking "new" messages as not-Junk also make SA do
the analysis?
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
12 matches
Mail list logo
