On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 15:12 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> [I tried this on 2.4.1 and 2.5.1 with the same result.]
>
> First some background which may or may no be relevant. The way I handle
> spam is for a server-side SpamAssassin process to file suspect messages
> in a SPAM folder. For fals
hi david,
Am Dienstag, den 22.11.2005, 14:22 -0500 schrieb David Bicking:
> I recently switched to version 2.4.1. I noticed a change. I used to
> minimize evolution and the text that would show in the ... task bar(?)
> would have the name of the current folder, and the number of unread mail
> in t
I recently switched to version 2.4.1. I noticed a change. I used to
minimize evolution and the text that would show in the ... task bar(?)
would have the name of the current folder, and the number of unread mail
in that folder. I could then glance down to see if new mail arrived. Now
it says "Evolu
[I tried this on 2.4.1 and 2.5.1 with the same result.]
First some background which may or may no be relevant. The way I handle
spam is for a server-side SpamAssassin process to file suspect messages
in a SPAM folder. For false negatives (i.e. undetected spam) I manually
move the offending message
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 19:54 +0100, guenther wrote:
> [ snipp ]
> > And by the way, it's Shift-Ctrl-D, not Ctrl-U.
>
> It's Ctrl-U in 2.2.x and before and Shift-Ctrl-D since 2.4.0.
True.
poc
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http
[ snipp ]
> And by the way, it's Shift-Ctrl-D, not Ctrl-U.
It's Ctrl-U in 2.2.x and before and Shift-Ctrl-D since 2.4.0.
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 18:41 +0100, guenther wrote:
> >
> > Of course if there was an Undo action, it wouldn't matter. Undo (at
> > least for deletes and moves) is sorely needed in any case IMHO. This
> has
> > been requested, repeatedly (see
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207624 for
> > Note that some of the folders are shared, i.e. mail arrives in them "by
> > magic" and not via Evo, so there's no chance of invoking a filter.
>
> Magic?? (and not via Evo??). If you are using Evolution, they should
> obviously come thru Evo.
No. IMAP. *sigh*
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> For IMAP accounts, Preferences->...->Receiving Options has a check box
> for "Check for new mail in all folders". I have a lot of folders on the
> server and only some of them are ever going to have new mail in them
> unless I drag it there. Checking every folder can be slow (my
> conjecture; I
> > Partha, did you update the README in the gnome-2-12 branch as well?
>
> Nope, should be done
Uhm... So?
I do know it should be done. That's why I asked this in the first place.
Consider it a hint, rather than a question...
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,
>
> Of course if there was an Undo action, it wouldn't matter. Undo (at
> least for deletes and moves) is sorely needed in any case IMHO. This has
> been requested, repeatedly (see
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207624 for an example), over
> *4 years*, and no progress has been made
Hi all
i've got an issue with evolution.
I've got a debian sarge server with ldap and i'm trying to edit and
change contact's information.
My sladpd.conf seems correct :
access to attrs=userPassword,sambaLMPassword,sambaNTPassword
by anonymous auth
by self write
by * non
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 12:03 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 11:56, Andrew Joyce wrote:
>
> > First, the cached information on the message state in Evolution isn't
> > being committed to the server, even during the periodic mail checks it
> > seems.
>
> Yes. I have to "work of
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 05:56 -0500, Andrew Joyce wrote:
> I am having some issues getting Evolution and Thunderbird to place nice
> together with my IMAP account. I access my IMAP from two different
> computers at work and home using Evo on one and Thunderbird on the other
> (work is Windows). I j
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 12:03 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Yes. I have to "work offline" (or quit Evo) to have the status
> synchronized back to the server.
Same here. To prevent trouble, I always try to prevent two copies of
Evolution being online at the same time.
Koen
__
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 11:56, Andrew Joyce wrote:
> First, the cached information on the message state in Evolution isn't
> being committed to the server, even during the periodic mail checks it
> seems.
Yes. I have to "work offline" (or quit Evo) to have the status
synchronized back to the serve
I am having some issues getting Evolution and Thunderbird to place nice
together with my IMAP account. I access my IMAP from two different
computers at work and home using Evo on one and Thunderbird on the other
(work is Windows). I just recently switched to Evo as I really liked
the integration
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 22:47 -0800, Des Dougan wrote:
> Apologies for jumping in, but could you clarify what "the diverse nature
> of camel providers" means? What does camel provide for Evo?
>
Camel is Evolution's mail access and storage library.
(http://go-evolution.org/Camel)
diverse nature of
18 matches
Mail list logo
