On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 13:39 -0700, William Cassis wrote:
> Right now, we have a couple public folder trees with hundreds of
> subfolders inside them. In the evolution 1.x branch, I was able to
> navigate through these trees. Unfortunately, it looks like in order to
> use public folders with 2.x,
Hi,
You have all the addressbook.db files back up right?
Are you able to access your personal book, and only the sub folders
are failing?
can you just backup your .evolution/addressbook and re-create the
folders and place these db files under the directories created for
the new sub folders in .e
Hi
Is there any place to find eplugins for evolution ? I want to add more
function to it
also what is the main evolution website ? in the net I can find more
than 3 website with different roadmaps !!
--
Best Regards,
-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have
Your exchange backend is crashing.
Account setup went on fine for you? You can also try to
create an account using Evolution's account setup wizard.
I think it is better to file a bug with gdb traces for
evolution-exchange-storage, when it crashes.
See http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/bugs
A couple of questions:
a) Is it possible to disable the sig-dashes ("-- ")? I could do this in
Mutt, meaning I could put my name in the sig, followed by the dashes,
followed by the actual signature part of it.
b) Is it possible to make Evolution reply to messages from a mailing
list using a cert
hi miguel,
Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2005, 11:59 +0200 schrieb Miguel Decleire:
> As you say, the new values get overwritten after logout and back in
> gnome, but the numbers of the group uid and source uid of the "Personal"
> addressbook have grown higher in the rewriting (and so for example, a
>
hi steve,
Am Freitag, den 16.09.2005, 15:36 -0700 schrieb Steve Auerbach:
> I right-clicked on a message, and noticed an item "Convert to Task". As
> far as I can tell this does nothing. Is there a How-To somewhere which
> explains how to use this?
normally you should get a dialog window where yo
Le samedi 17 septembre 2005 à 21:02 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast a écrit :
> looks to be an exercise in maximising wasted space to me... a bit
> inefficient of a UI.
Agreed. What's missing in Evo is a layout with summary and mail view
side-by-side, like that:
---
| 1 || 1: folders
On Sa, 2005-09-17 at 22:57 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> It's still wasting an *incredible* amount of space chewing up all
> that real estate repeating Reply, Reply to All, Forward & Mover
> for every message. Blech.
Possibly, but is cutting away from every title a better alternative? If
it is not,
