On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 3:36:31 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
Barandes formulation of QM avoids complex Hilbert space, but gives up
describing paths thru configuration space.
Brent
What does "gives up" mean, that it can, or cannot describe paths through
configuration space? AG
On 3/
Barandes formulation of QM avoids complex Hilbert space, but gives up
describing paths thru configuration space.
Brent
On 3/17/2025 5:13 AM, John Clark wrote:
*We know that some observables (like momentum and position, and energy
and time) are non commuting, therefore any theory that attempts
*We know that some observables (like momentum and position, and energy and
time) are non commuting, therefore any theory that attempts to describe
that behavior is going to need to have non commuting mathematical entities
in it. And if you're going to explain the quantum interference effects that
o
1) What necessitates the use of complex numbers (whereas in GR only real
numbers are used)?
2) What necessitates the postulate that some, but presumably not all
operators are non commuting?
3) With respect to 2), why is the non commuting difference i*h (or i*hbar)?
TY, AG
--
You received this
4 matches
Mail list logo