I don't know if such mails are allowed to be posted at IETF-WG mailing lists; especially in the case when he receives it many time because he is am member at many list
On 2/27/06, Robert Holliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Registration Open!!!
Reston Virginia, April 17-19
Early Registration
,
Badra
On 10/23/06, Charles Clancy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So that answers the questions from my last email. It sounds like PKI vsPSK is a reasonable split, but for reasons somewhat unrelated to EAP vs
TLS credential negotiation, which I don't see as a big problem,personally.Should t
that
EAP-TLS reconsider this document for identity protection implementations.
The document is available for your review and comments at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hajjeh-tls-identity-protection-00.txt
Best regards,
Badra
> This is a working group last call for draft-simon-emu-rf
rts all ciphersuites except those
based on static DH (static DH may be added, but not a full identity
protection will be therefore provided).
Best regards,
Badra
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Hi Joe,
IMO, it is nice to have a SHOULD or MAY regarding EAP-TLS with OCSP.
The particular situation in which this requirement does not apply may be
related the interoperability issues described
indraft-ietf-tls-interoperability-00.
Best regards,
Badra
On 2/15/07, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey
Does it need to recharter?
Best regards,
Badra
On 3/28/07, Bernard Aboba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The latest EAP-TTLSv0 draft is available here:
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-funk-eap-ttls-v0-00.txt
In terms of publication interest, back in the fall Jari Arkko had
annou
Since Nancy comments are reasonable and that EAP-FAST is designed in a nice
fashion, I think it is good to add it as option d)
Best regards,
Badra
On 4/13/07, Pascal Urien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Everybody,
The emu working agreed on the fact that a secure channel is needed
Hi Joe,
Please add me to the list of volunteers.
Best regards,
Badra
On 10/30/07, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have working group consensus to move forward with working on a
> tunneled EAP method in order to provide the basis for a password bas
Hi all,
When privacy is activated with respect to section 2.1.4., which
master_secret (the 1st or 2nd handshake) is used in section 2.3?
Best regards
Badra
On Dec 6, 2007 4:11 AM, The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the EAP Method Update WG (e
+1
> I'm also in favor...
>
> Nancy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Hao Zhou (hzhou)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:45 PM
> To: Stephen Hanna; Joseph Salowey (jsalowey); Alan DeKok; emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] EMU W
I am FOR
Best regards
Badra
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
11 matches
Mail list logo
