[Emu] Eric Rescorla's Yes on charter-ietf-emu-04-01: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-21 Thread Eric Rescorla
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-emu-04-01: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other

[Emu] New Chair: Mohit Sethi

2018-07-20 Thread Eric Rescorla
I am pleased to announce that Mohit Sethi has agreed to serve as co-chair for EMU. Thanks to Mohit! -Ekr ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-01-04 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:08 AM Alan DeKok wrote: > On Jan 3, 2021, at 10:44 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > > # Key Schedule > > > > The other thing I observe is the way that this slices up the exporter > output. This was something that old versions of TLS did, but TLS 1.3 did > away with. Though

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-02-01 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:02 PM Alan DeKok wrote: > This is a new message to summarize history, requirements, etc. for > EAP-TLS and TLS 1.3. The focus here is the requirements for EAP-TLS, and > how the 0x00 commitment message versus CloseNotify meets those. I'll > ignore the exporter chang

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-02-01 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:42 AM Alan DeKok wrote: > On Feb 1, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Let's take the second case first. If the server is sending (or > > potentially sending) post-handshake messages after the client's second > > flight (e.g.

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-02-01 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:22 AM Alan DeKok wrote: > On Feb 1, 2021, at 11:09 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > That's not what I'm proposing. I'm only talking about the case where the > server says this after flight (2). > > OK, my misreading of the text. >

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-02-04 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:57 AM John Mattsson wrote: > Hi, > > > > I think the idea of a new TLS extension to make TLS 1.3 and EAP-TLS > interact better is a very promising idea. This would probably take some > time to get specified and implemented so it is probably a future > optimization/simpli

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-02-04 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 6:29 AM Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:57 AM John Mattsson > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I think the idea of a new TLS extension to make TLS 1.3 and EAP-TLS >> interact better is a very promising