Hi Joe,
I have 3 comments, listed below.
Thanks,
Dorothy Stanley
---
1. 3rd list item:
- A mechanism to support extensible communication within a TLS protected
tunnel that meets RFC 3748 and RFC 4017 requirements. This mechanism
must support channel bindings in order
Joe,
I do not approve of the charter revision; the charter should not prohibit
the group
from using a non-tunneled method for the password-based method.
My previous mail gave a suggested charter text change.
I can participate as a reviewer.
Thanks,
Dorothy Stanley
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11
published method and similar deployed
methods - to meet the desire to document deployed methods.
Dorothy Stanley
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Glen Zorn wrote:
>
> > Dear EMU WG:
> >
> > These two documents are in the RFC Editor queue:
> >
> >draft-cam-wing
I support allocating a new method type for the new standard method, sooner,
rather than later.
The new method is defined by an IETF group, based on
submissions/modifications
from multiple parties, and should carry/use an IETF rather than specific
vendor identifier.
Dorothy
On Sat, May 14, 2011 a
wey wrote:
>
> On May 16, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Dorothy Stanley wrote:
>
> > I support allocating a new method type for the new standard method,
> sooner, rather than later.
> >
> > The new method is defined by an IETF group, based on
> submissions/modifications
> &g
