Re: [Emu] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob-01

2020-07-11 Thread Carsten Bormann
Hi Mohit, > On 2020-07-11, at 15:27, Mohit Sethi M > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for the input. This is indeed something we should discuss at the > upcoming virtual EMU meeting. > > Some colleagues (Ingles Sanchez et al.) have also investigated and documented > the savings that migh

Re: [Emu] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob-01

2020-07-31 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2020-07-31, at 09:25, Aura Tuomas wrote: > > That is, my biggest concern with both JSON and CBOR is (4) the lack of > canonical binary serialization. IN EAP-NOOB, we need to receive a serialized > data message, extract some fields and subtrees, compose an HMAC input out of > these parts of

Re: [Emu] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob-01

2020-07-31 Thread Carsten Bormann
quickly is more important. Grüße, Carsten (*) My personal recommendation would also be to define the data structures and their extension points using some formal technique. Independent of whether they are JSON or CBOR, CDDL (RFC 8610) fits the bill. > On 2020-07-31, at 09:51, Carsten Borm

Re: [Emu] [core] [Ace] Proposed charter for ACE (EAP over CoAP?)

2020-12-09 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2020-12-09, at 14:28, Christian Amsüss wrote: > > follow CoRE best practices Indeed; for instance, we “RESTified” documents in ACE before (and they not just became ideologically correct, but also plain better). Grüße, Carsten signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP