[Emu] Re: Review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc-01

2024-10-04 Thread Dan Garcia Carrillo
Hi Marco, Thank you very much for the review. Please, see comments inline. Best regards. El 26/9/24 a las 13:51, Marco Tiloca escribió: Hi all, Please see below some comments about this document. Hope it helps! Best, /Marco --- [General] * The title can incl

[Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-02 comments

2024-10-04 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
Sections '3.4.1. EAP Supplicants' and '3.4.2. EAP Peers' +++ The section title use term 'supplicant' which is not used much by the EAP RFC 3748. To quote RFC 3748: peer The end of the link that responds to the authenticator. In [IEEE-802.1X], thi

[Emu] Re: draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-06 notes

2024-10-04 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 16:26, Alan DeKok wrote: > Perhaps: > > # EAP Peers > > An EAP session begins with the peer receiving an initial > EAP-Request/Identity message. An EAP peer supporting this > specification MUST examining the identity to see if it uses the eap.arpa > realm. If not, the EA

[Emu] Re: draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-06 notes

2024-10-04 Thread Alan DeKok
On Oct 4, 2024, at 4:19 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > Can you give me an example of foo@ vs bar@ which would both be under > eap.arpa? Different provisioning methods which use the same underlying EAP method. > The I-D mentioned in the subject line is bootstrapped-tls, and it uses > tls-pok-

[Emu] Re: draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-02 comments

2024-10-04 Thread Alan DeKok
On Oct 4, 2024, at 12:46 PM, Heikki Vatiainen wrote: > For me it seems section 3.4.1 title should be 'EAP Peers' and section 3.4.2 > 'EAP Servers'. This would also require carefully updating some instances of > 'peer' to 'server' and all mentions of 'supplicant' to 'peer'. I don't think > there

[Emu] Re: draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-02 comments

2024-10-04 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 20:30, Alan DeKok wrote: > On Oct 4, 2024, at 12:46 PM, Heikki Vatiainen > wrote: > > > That is, switching to a non-provisioning fully credentialed > authentication with a NAK shouldn't be done when the initial > EAP-Response/Identity contains an eap.arpa domain. Also, wh

[Emu] Re: draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-06 notes

2024-10-04 Thread Michael Richardson
Alan DeKok wrote: > However, the situation is more difficult if the EAP supplicant signals > an NAI for an EAP method which is supported by the peer, but which > contains a provisioning method which the peer does not support. The > normal EAP NAK signalling allows selection only

[Emu] Re: draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-02 comments

2024-10-04 Thread Alan DeKok
On Oct 4, 2024, at 3:18 PM, Heikki Vatiainen wrote: > I was thinking something like this: > - EAP client has credentials for EAP methodX that are about expire; > provisioning is required > - The client attempts provisioning with EAP identity ending with > methodX.eap.arpa > - The server for some

[Emu] Re: Review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc-01

2024-10-04 Thread Marco Tiloca
Hello Dan, Thanks for considering my comments. Please see inline below, where I have kept only the remaining open point about message correlation. Best, /Marco On 2024-10-04 10:18, Dan Garcia Carrillo wrote: You don't often get email from garcia...@uniovi.es. Learn why this is i