[Emu] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: (with COMMENT)

2024-05-30 Thread Warren Kumari via Datatracker
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[Emu] Re: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: (with COMMENT)

2024-05-30 Thread Alan DeKok
On May 29, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Warren Kumari via Datatracker wrote: > My primary remaining comment is that Abstract for the document briefly should > say *how* it updates RFC9427 - that way when someone reads RFC9427 they need > only check this new document's Abstract to know if they need to read t

[Emu] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: (with COMMENT)

2024-05-30 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to ht

[Emu] Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: (with COMMENT)

2024-05-30 Thread Alan DeKok
On May 30, 2024, at 9:52 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-16-intdir-telechat-song-2024-05-10/ > by Haoyu Song (and I have not seen any reply to Haoyu's comments). I just replied now. It was in my "todo" list for too long. >