Hi EMU Chairs,
I was looking to see if any minor updates are needed to
draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-03 before IETF 118 and WGLC.
There was one outstanding action from IETF 117:
Do we want to say there is an eap.arpa domain? Yes, but
not clear this draft is place to do that. Chairs to ask IAB
Hi EMU Chairs,
draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls is proposed Standards Track and depends on RFC
8773 which is Experimental.
Do we need to talk to TLS WG about changing RFC 8773 from Experimental? How
does this process work?
Thanks,
Owen+Dan
___
Emu mai
That one’s on me, gents. I have the action to inquire and will do so ASAP.
-Peter
On 8/30/23, 3:29 AM, "Owen Friel (ofriel)" wrote:
Hi EMU Chairs,
I was looking to see if any minor updates are needed to
draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-03 before IETF
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 21:20, Eliot Lear wrote:
> First, section 3.11.1 states that authentication is needed before
> provisioning, but C.11. does not show any authentication. Should the
> diagram show phase 1 client certificate authentication or phase 2 tunnelled
> authentication? Are both valid
On Aug 30, 2023, at 6:29 AM, Owen Friel (ofriel)
wrote:
>
> Hi EMU Chairs,
>
> I was looking to see if any minor updates are needed to
> draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-03 before IETF 118 and WGLC.
>
> There was one outstanding action from IETF 117:
>
> Do we want to say there is an eap.a
Alan,
I've also sent an inquiry to the IAB on the matter to see if they have
any thoughts. I'll post to the list if they come back with any opinions. Your
draft will also be helpful either way as we can decide whether to incorporate
their thoughts (if they've some concrete and coherent t
