draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-08 added the following paragraph to section
7.4.1. "User Identity Protection and Verification":
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-07&url2=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-08&difftype=--html
Note that the Phase 2 data could simply be a Result TLV
The list in section 4.2.1 "General TLV Format" includes:
11 PAC TLV (DEPRECATED)
I suggest re-adding the subsection for PAC TLV with a brief note that it's
deprecated. This would serve as reminder that TLV number 11 did exist and
it would also keep the section numbering unchanged making it easi
On Aug 21, 2023, at 10:40 AM, Heikki Vatiainen
wrote:
>
> draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-08 added the following paragraph to section 7.4.1.
> "User Identity Protection and Verification":
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-07&url2=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-08&diffty
On Aug 21, 2023, at 11:05 AM, Heikki Vatiainen
wrote:
>
> The list in section 4.2.1 "General TLV Format" includes:
>11 PAC TLV (DEPRECATED)
>
> I suggest re-adding the subsection for PAC TLV with a brief note that it's
> deprecated. This would serve as reminder that TLV number 11 did exist
Alan DeKok wrote:
>> I suggest re-adding the subsection for PAC TLV with a brief note that
>> it's deprecated. This would serve as reminder that TLV number 11 did
>> exist and it would also keep the section numbering unchanged making it
>> easier to compare RFC 7170 and its update