Re: [Emu] Housekeeping functionality (Was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-09.txt)

2023-08-02 Thread Michael Richardson
Alan DeKok wrote: > The simplest way to do this may be to require that any provisioning > phase result in EAP Failure. The inner tunnel can return the > credentials, crypto-binding TLV, and a Result TLV which indicates > success. But the final outer EAP packet should be EAP Fa

Re: [Emu] Housekeeping functionality (Was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-09.txt)

2023-08-02 Thread Eliot Lear
I don't think this is a substantive change, because what Heikki is raising is entirely a matter of server-side policy.  I also am not sure it's the right change.  For one thing, if a server is willing to issue a new certificate, that's likely a policy statement that everything is AOK.  For anot

Re: [Emu] Housekeeping functionality (Was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-09.txt)

2023-08-02 Thread Alexander Clouter
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, at 18:49, Eliot Lear wrote: > Keep this in mind: end devices should be presumed to be pressed for > resources, and anything requiring additional unnecessary authentications > should be avoided in that case. I could imagine a realtime video streaming device that during a repro

Re: [Emu] Housekeeping functionality (Was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-09.txt)

2023-08-02 Thread Alan DeKok
On Aug 2, 2023, at 1:49 PM, Eliot Lear wrote: > I don't think this is a substantive change, because what Heikki is raising is > entirely a matter of server-side policy. I also am not sure it's the right > change. For one thing, if a server is willing to issue a new certificate, > that's likel