Re: [Emu] [suspect] Re: Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-08

2023-07-27 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 11:45, Dan Garcia Carrillo wrote: On 5/7/23 15:36, Alan DeKok wrote: > > >Given that the EAP packets can be forced to be no more than 1024 > octets, the only difference between EAP methods is the number of packets > exchanged, and the total amount of data exchanged.

[Emu] [IANA #1277499] expert review for draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs (eapsimaka-numbers)

2023-07-27 Thread David Dong via RT
Dear Vesa Lehtovirta (cc: emu WG), As the designated expert for the Attribute Types (Skippable Attributes 128-255) registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs/ The due date is August 10t

Re: [Emu] [Ace] [suspect] Re: Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-08

2023-07-27 Thread Behcet Sarikaya
+1 to Heikki. I think the use of AAA, in particular EAP for IoT is simply not practical, thanks to Heikki for making this specific. It could be theoretically beautiful though :) Behcet On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 7:08 AM Heikki Vatiainen wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 11:45, Dan Garcia Carrillo