Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer t
On Feb 16, 2023, at 1:28 AM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> [Joe] I think having a separate section in the security considerations for
> Session Resumption is a good idea. A few comments on the text below since I
> think there is a potential difference between how TTLS recommends
> overloading newS
On Feb 16, 2023, at 12:21 AM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
wrote:
> \\--
>
> In Section 2.1:
>
> Which define Master Session Key (MSK) and Extended Master Session Key
> (EMSK).
>
> This seems to be part of a larger sentence that's partly missing.
I'll clarify that.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:20 AM Alan DeKok
wrote:
> > It is RECOMMENDED that vendor-defined TLS-based EAP methods use the
> > above definitions for TLS 1.3. There is no compelling reason to use
> > different definitions.
> >
> > Why isn't this MUST if there's no compelling reason to do oth
On Feb 16, 2023, at 10:14 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The outer identity SHOULD use an anonymous NAI realm, which allows for
> both user privacy, and for the EAP session to be routed in an AAA
> framework as described in [RFC7542] Section 3. Where NAI realms are
> not used, packets will not
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the EAP Method Update WG of the IETF.
Title : TLS-based EAP types and TLS 1.3
Author : Alan DeKok
Filename: draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-13.tx
This version addresses all outstanding reviews from the IESG.
> On Feb 16, 2023, at 2:11 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the EAP Method Update WG of the IETF.
>
>
Thanks Alan, your text looks good.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 5:48 AM Alan DeKok
wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2023, at 1:28 AM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> > [Joe] I think having a separate section in the security considerations
> for Session Resumption is a good idea. A few comments on the text below
> sinc
