One of the questions which came up at the interim call was about the PAC.
The discussion there was that PAC support was in hostap, but no other
implementations support it.
Even more, there didn't seem to be much support for implementing it. So the
question is, should we just drop PAC supp
On Jan 14, 2023, at 6:13 AM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> The TEAP section will need a light refresh to capture the reworked
> {ISMK,ICMK,S-IMCK,CMK}_{MSK,EMSK} section now present in RFC7170bis.
I've taken a look at it, and I think the document is in pretty good shape.
It requires some minor
