Re: [Emu] More TEAP issues

2022-11-30 Thread Alan DeKok
On Nov 30, 2022, at 1:24 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > I'd also like to take some time to consider what additional TLVs may be > required. Right now there is an incongruence between TEAP and other > protocols that sign certs in that there is no CSR attributes TLV. There may > be several others to c

Re: [Emu] More TEAP issues

2022-11-30 Thread Alexander Clouter
Hello, On Tue, 29 Nov 2022, at 22:34, Alan DeKok wrote: > Based on interoperability testing, it looks like implementations > followed EAP-FAST for derivation of the MS-MPPE keys, and not RFC 7170: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/hostap/2022-July/040639.html > > http://lists.infradead.org

Re: [Emu] More TEAP issues

2022-11-30 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:01:08PM +, Alexander Clouter wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2022, at 22:34, Alan DeKok wrote: > > Based on interoperability testing, it looks like implementations > > followed EAP-FAST for derivation of the MS-MPPE keys, and not RFC 7170: > EAP-FAST almost does not documen

Re: [Emu] [EXTERNAL] Re: More TEAP issues

2022-11-30 Thread Bruno Pereira Vidal
I also think option 3 is the preferred one at this point, given the interoperable implementations that have already shipped. In addition to Cisco ISE, the Windows TEAP implementation has also been validated against Aruba ClearPass. The person who implemented the Windows client code is no longer

[Emu] Minutes from IETF 115 are available

2022-11-30 Thread Peter Yee
The minutes from the IETF 115 EMU session have been published at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/materials/minutes-115-emu-202211071 530-00. Thanks so much to Janfred Rieckers for the in-meeting notetaking. It's greatly appreciated and crucial to a successful meeting. Cheers, Pete

Re: [Emu] [EXTERNAL] Re: More TEAP issues

2022-11-30 Thread Joseph Salowey
It sounds like we are gaining consensus to create a revision of TEAP. The emphasis would be (in priority order): - Aligning specification with current implementations - Clarifying the existing specification - Adding missing TLVs to make existing use cases work better The goal is to get

Re: [Emu] [EXTERNAL] Re: More TEAP issues

2022-11-30 Thread Eliot Lear
No, but I would ask that we still have an interim to close the errata. Eliot On 01.12.22 06:22, Joseph Salowey wrote: It sounds like we are gaining consensus to create a revision of TEAP.  The emphasis would be (in priority order): * Aligning specification with current implementations * C