Please find below my comments. I think the draft can move forward. The
comments below are clarifications and minor fixes. The list is quite long
but I think there aren't any functional changes.
Naming things
+++
Should the EAP type names named consistently? For example, always use
EAP-FAS
On Jun 20, 2022, at 11:20 AM, Heikki Vatiainen
wrote:
> Please find below my comments. I think the draft can move forward. The
> comments below are clarifications and minor fixes. The list is quite long but
> I think there aren't any functional changes.
That's fine. Unless otherwise noted b
