Re: [Emu] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types

2022-06-14 Thread Alan DeKok
On Jun 13, 2022, at 3:57 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > > Major concerns: > > Section 3, 3rd para: It is unclear to me what "relevant resumption and/or EAP > type" means. Please expand this discussion. In context: As a result, implementations MUST check for application data once the TLS sessio

Re: [Emu] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types

2022-06-14 Thread Russ Housley
> On Jun 14, 2022, at 2:12 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2022, at 3:57 PM, Russ Housley wrote: >> >> Major concerns: >> >> Section 3, 3rd para: It is unclear to me what "relevant resumption and/or >> EAP type" means. Please expand this discussion. > > In context: > > > As a res

Re: [Emu] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types

2022-06-14 Thread Alan DeKok
On Jun 14, 2022, at 2:09 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > > I think you should just say that: TTLS, PEAP, and FAST each have > method-specific application data. Done. > This resolves all of my concerns. Thanks. I'll push another version of the document at the end of the last call. Alan DeK