Re: [Emu] [Ace] [core] Proposed charter for ACE (EAP over CoAP?)

 Hi Michael, "/1) .../" For onboarding a new device, where there is no connectivity after authentication, you propose to use 802.1X, which is an EAP lower layer. EAP over CoAP is in fact a proposal for a application level EAP lower layer that overcomes the limitation that 802.1X works on an

[Emu] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http

Re: [Emu] [core] [Ace] Proposed charter for ACE (EAP over CoAP?)

Hi Dan, Could you be more specific on the point below, what deficiencies do you have in mind? Mališa From: core on behalf of Dan Garcia Date: Thursday 10 December 2020 at 10:06 To: Michael Richardson , EMU WG , "c...@ietf.org WG (c...@ietf.org)" , "a...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [co

Re: [Emu] Proposed Resolution for TEAP errata 5768

This change looks good to me. Would appreciate a sanity check of another implementation by Oleg to make sure I have my facts straight here. From: Joseph Salowey Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2020 9:24 PM To: Jorge Vergara Cc: Oleg Pekar ; EMU WG ; Jouni Malinen Subject: Re: Proposed Resolution f