On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:06 PM Jorge Vergara
wrote:
> >[Joe] (catching up) With respect to the case that the method is an MSK
> generating mechanism and and MSK is not generated/used. I think the
> original intention was that this case would be a protocol violation, ie if
> a method generates a
Hi all,
I am not a crypto expert and my knowledge of public key encodings is
based on my work with Rene Struik for a different draft.
The current text in draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-04 says "For P-256, the
length of this value is 32 bytes, encoded in binary". Shouldn't this be
33 bytes? And wouldn'