Dear all:
I support the adoption of this document as well.
I have been following this work from the beginning since I have been interested
in the usage in EAP in IoT scenarios for bootstrapping for several years. As
Eduardo has just mentioned we worked in an EAP lower-layer based on CoAP for
Hi Mohit
>
> The chairs had an email discussion which hadn't concluded. The main
> sticking point was that both Joe and I prefer TEAP being addressed in a
> separate update document that fixes all other TEAP errata as well.
> However, this can be discussed after adoption.
Oleg has addressed t
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7170,
"Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6157
--
Type: Technical
